Duane Ford ladies and gentlemen: Ford spoke by telephone to Yahoo! Sports on Sunday. He said the criticism is a part of the job he accepts, but said those criticizing the outcome are almost certainly not familiar with the way fights are judged. "If this were American Idol, without a doubt, Manny Pacquiao would have won," Ford said. "But it was not. I gave an honest opinion. I had Pacquiao up 4-2, I think, at the end of six rounds. I thought he hurt Bradley a couple of times early in the fight. But when the bell rang to end that round, it was over and what happens in one round doesn't carry over to the next round. They're separate units. "In the second half of the fight, Pacquiao picked off a lot of punches to the head, but Bradley landed some hard body shots. That hurt Pacquiao. I don't mean it hurt him in the sense of it physically hurting him, but in terms of scoring and piling up points. Bradley did an excellent job standing his ground as a boxer. Remember, it's a boxing match and Bradley demonstrated his ability to box expertly." "In pro boxing, you look for damage, and if the punches are equal and the damage is equal, you are looking for effective aggression, and that does not necessarily mean the guy going forward," Ford said. "Effective aggression can be a guy going back. And then you look at ring generalship, and that's all about control. "When you score a fight of that magnitude, you know the criticism comes with the job. But unless you are totally focused on that scoring zone for three minutes, it's impossible to score the fight correctly. I know you can't do it talking into a microphone. It was a close fight in my mind that could have gone either way. The result was nothing more than three judges giving an honest opinion, and nothing other than that."
He's saying what he has to say. . . What do you expect him to say? He's been doing this for decades, so he knows what the deal is. . . All haradcore fans knows exactly how boxing is scored. . . And to think REAL FANS will be suckered into believing what he;s saying? Maybe new fans will be liek "oh, wow, he sounds like he DOES Know what he's talking about! HE MUST BE RIGHT!" **** a misdemeanor larceny, this was a highway, armed ****ing robbery. . .
At least he spoke out- I don't like his idea of effective aggression but his other points i'm in line with
effective aggression, ring generalship, clean effective punching....hmmmmm This dude will never judge an important fight again.
:good That was the dumbest **** I ever heard from a Professional judge, Agreesively going backwards????:huh
Amen! I don't expect him to say. "I ****ed up the scoring." Him saying critics don't know how to score a fight?!? That's downright stupid.
Interesting. He makes a good case for his point of view, but it still doesn't justify being SO far off the mark in a big fight.