A Mayweather Revisionist's worst nightmare:

sorry kid, try again:rofl the real champ is the offical champ and takes precedence over any interim titlist:deal casamayor didn't become the official WBA champ until his fight with jwong kwon baek in may of 2000. and if shane is the real wbc champ how come the WBC didn't force floyd to fight him.

you sure are getting desperate.


oh and guru you are definitiely a ***** made mother-****er:deal you can't even take care of a ****ing lightweight like robbasehead.

 

They are both champs. The only reason there is an interim champion is because they are unsure of the champions status. If the interim champion becomes the ONLY champion, then all of his defenses count since he could certainly lose that title when he defends it.

Don't ask why the WBC did this or that, it's their rules, you ask them.

Either way, playing around with this still doesn't answer why PBF never fought Casamayor, as even with only 5 defense going by what you said, he had as many as Corrales and had his belt after PBF fought Corrales. You can't use Corrales cuz PBF could have fought him afterwards.

Chicken :good

 

wrong again..floyd is the wbc champ not mosley:rofl

you brought it up ***** made now defend it:deal

floyd was the ring/lineal wbc champ at 130. he didn't have to fight the other title holders because they were all paper champs:deal floyd's first priority was the defense of the WBC strap not fighting casamayor who was not even considered a threat at the time until after he beat corrales his first real test:deal

 

Chicken:good

 

if he wasnt a coward he would have fought him, if he wasnt a coward he wouldnt have shut his mouth when Winky accepted his challenge. . . . too bad he IS a coward.

 

yeah, yeah you just lost another argument because your too dumb for stupid:nut :rofl I told you before you started that you weren't in my league:deal

now get the **** back in your cage:deal

 

how many championship fights have you been in again:blood

 

You always talk about no one being in your league. But you're too chicken to prove it.

Talk is cheap. Chicken

 

heres a simple question. . . what the fukc does that have to do with the point I made????

So if I question a politician, he can respond "How many times have you held public office??"

If you cant refute my point, either agree with it or move on.

 

down boy down:rofl

 

Cluck cluck...thumbsup

 

did you not just post this garbage:

the question remains who are you to call floyd a coward:deal I mean are you an expert on courage:rofl how many championship fights have you been in. do you know what it takes to be a champion. :deal

word of advice:smoke leave the analogies alone you suck at them:rofl A politician doesn't have any physical battles, I mean why use something so lame and stupid.

read the above posts, now go put on your dunce cap along with the rest of the revisionists

 

You dont have to be a professional boxer to know the meaning of courage. Fraud has proven his cowardice more than once. . . he clearly ducked Margarito, he called out Winky only to shut his mouth when Winky accepted his challenge. . . You dont bother to try to refute these points cause you know its true.

You make it sound as if no one can question the Fraud if he hasnt been a Boxing Champion, and thats just plain dumb.

Face it, Fraud is a cherry picking coward. If he's your hero then god bless the fans of cowards.

 

You're a hypocritical ****.

You're welcome. :thumbsup