A Mayweather Revisionist's worst nightmare:

Yup....he was. Hatton was the champ though so in actual rankings Gatti was #2.

 

wrong, the ring does not rank the champ. I mean think for a minute why would the champ be ranked:huh so there are no "kg0208 rankings" there is 1-10 and then the champ:deal

 

I didn't say Ring rankings....I said actual rankings, as in mathmatical.

The champion exists does he not? So if we were to put the fighters from top to bottom in each weight class, the champ would be at the top right? Hatton would be the best, followed by Gatti at the time.

Therefore in actuality, based on this, he was the #2 fighter in the division. Is PBF not the #1 WW in the world? Did you not answer that thread titled Who is the #1 WW with the answer PBF? It's not a shot at Gatti or PBF so you are just looking for a fight. Please feel free, as you will be the only participant. I don't fight people I know I can beat. You don't deserve that type of attention or effort.

You rank fighters all the time...so I can as well.

 

I call bull****:deal casamayor did not accomplish more then corrales at 130 or 135. and at 135 casamayor did not accomplish more then castillo.

your argument falls flat because floyd already fought the top guys at 130 and 135. cassa did not distinguish himself like corrales and castillo did during that period.:deal

I'm glad you know your place in this argument:deal

 

1-10 is not math. are you implying that kg0208 is more mathematical then ring:deal the ring is an organization you are what again:blood

the champ is not a ranked contender. common sense tells you not to rank a champion.:-(

based on kg0208 logic he is..baed on the ring he is #1 ranked:deal

no he is the champ:tired

yeah, yeah, you tired of ****ing up and me putting my foot in your ass:boxx

 

Nothing but opinion there.

Not worth debating since I already showed facts. When you have facts, come back and we can discuss.

 

Still didn't say anything. 1-10 isn't mathmatically correct?

The champ is the top fighter in the division, and common sense says the champ is #1 overall in that division. Just like in every other sport. You can cling to that if you like. Common sense prevails elsewhere.

 

Next time someone makes a thread asking who the #1 WW in the world is, I expect that you will answer that Cotto is because he is ranked #1 by Ring. But you won't because you didn't a couple of days ago. You said PBF.

 

don't apologize not even necessary:thumbsup

now you sound stupid. sharmba had fought at 147 cassa had not. how can you say cassa would have done better at 147 when he never even had a fight at that weight:deal are you saying cassa is on floyd's level. how many titles had cassa won at the age of 30:hey

please name these people:deal

yeah sure you like floyd, but he ducked a 33 year old cassa at 147. you are not very intelligent putting forth such an argument:rofl

I call bull****, tell cassa to get his ass up to 147 and then talk ****. no welterweight is going to fight a lightweight unless they are gifted like floyd, mosley, and duran:deal

once again what guy planning to fight at 147 would fight a 135lber to prepare for welterweight:deal

thats why I'm tearing you a new *******:good

you couldn't destroy a gnat you ****ing idiot. floyd vs williams is not even close to reality but if they did fight no way williams would beat him. :deal

 

so you're smarter then ring and espn:deal both orgs do not rank the champ but your backwards ass does. floyd is the champ but cotto is recognized as #1 by ring. I clearly see the difference why can't you:deal

 

the ring does not rate floyd #1at 147..ask your dumb ass why:nut

 

Bigtime, you always claim you win every argument. Put your account where your mouth is.....

We can debate on any subject you want and have a Public poll on who's winning decided right here by ESB. If you win, I will leave for 6 months, if I win you do the same.

So instead of always claiming victory for yourself, you have the opportunity to prove that you are indeed the better poster. If you decline, I will assume you know the real outcomes of our debates which have been overwhelmingly one sided in my favor.

 

Boring.

 

what does this have to do with the topic of this thread:scaredas:

satay focused on the topic thread and your ******ed ass will do just fine

your an ass kisser a ****ing fake ass boxing expert:deal you know what we all know :deal you're my ***** with a collar of thorns

 

Yes or no. You brought up that you win every argument, so I guess this is as relevant as that. Answer the question....if you don't this time, then I know you're yellow.