And again this narrow minded comparison of a complete boxer (Golovkin) to a puncher (Matthysse) atsch. Damn, even Abel Sanchez, Golovkin's trainer, favored Danny Garcia over Matthysse :good. Wait what? Abel said Danny is better than the one who is "just as good as Golovkin". He must be crazy ha? Study boxing instead of jumping to these fast farted conclusions.
He was a very good amatuer who failed to win Olympic Gold and failed to medal when attempting to defend the world championship. His amatier career means very little in the pro ranks. Amir Khan was also a great amateur, as was David Haye, Odlanier Solis, James Degale, etc. The only reason you all raise GGG so high is he has KO power. He has beaten nobody and shown nothing in the ring other than great power and an ability to cut off the ring. Please show me the pro fights where he has exhibited wildly better boxing skills than Matthysse. Please explain with evidence why you think he's a complete boxer. This doesn't make a great fighter, it makes a very good one. Get ready, cos he will be dominated if he steps in with a legitimate P4P fighter. Ward and Floyd would embarrass him. Please also remember he is older than Ward and has achieved nothing but a paper title.
I love your non-existent boxing analysis attribute, go rewatch Matthysse vs Garcia fight, watch the first 6 rounds, where there was no eye injury, and rescore them, chexk Garcias fear all over, how tentative he was, it was not until the miracle injury that he started throwing his punches, stop being this moronic.. Go learn boxing idiots
Danny closed his eye with punches then dominated him. Lucas was supposed to be a beast and Garcia was supposed to have paper skin. What happened to that? Just like GGG, Lucas is used to hitting and hurting people. When he runs into someone who moves their head and feet, he has no answer. GGG will look very stupid if he ever were to get in the ring with Ward or Floyd. No he doesn't. He has never exhibited the neccessary skill set to even make it close. So all he needs is for Floyd to break his hand early and then he has a chance to make the fight close lol
People like you think they are geniuses for spotting the obvious. Yes, Ward has better skills. But that doesn't mean GGG is a bad fighter does it?
I don't think he is all that. He fought a bunch of bums, and squeaked by Rosado due to his lucky cut.
The point is that you idiotically compared Golovkin to Matthyse, when Golovkin is vastly more experienced than Matthyse and is a far more complete fighter. Want an example? He gets hit far less than Matthyse for one and doesn't trip and fall on his own ass or face everytime he tries to throw a hook from distance. :yep. atsch. Matthyse fights like a caveman, Golovkin is an assassin. If you can't see that Golovkin is far superior to Matthyse in every area than you're delusional. Since your whole thread is based on the foolish assumption that GGG=Matthyse, that makes your whole thread a fail. I'm not going to defend Golovkin too much because we have yet to see the best of him ( and we will once Martinez and Peter Quillin both grow a pair of balls ). Its fine if you think floyd or ward beats him, but for you to discredit Golovkin because of Matthyses loss last night when they are completely different fighters is just fking dumb. :hi: