Because I don't think it sounds fake in the reports of it when it happened. Sounds like McCoy was hurt fairly bad I think O'Brien was much easier to KO than Corbett, that he was only a middleweight probably contributed, and ancient Fitzsimmons was able to catch him.
As far as I'm concerned the jury is still out on this fight. O Brien went the distance twice with Burns who was a pretty decent puncher.
Eugene Hart has the raw power to stop him if he were to connect with a peach of a shot. Lausse is another fighter who I feel could mingle with the small great heavyweights of yesteryear with mixed results. Les Darcy was a middleweight great who also had success at LHW. He likely would have fought even larger fighters if he were to of lived and to of continued fighting...
I have put up a post, which I think is a fair summary of the evidence. We would always take rumors before the fight took place, and two witnesses corroborating each other, as tangible evidence of a fix. Even so, I think that there are enough problems with the witness testimony, to er on the side of rejecting it!
Would you care to explain why I should put my entire pay check on it, in terms that a person confronted with that decision, might find logical?
You would probably be justified in picking a cruiserweight sized fighter who was a renowned finisher over Corbett, because you would have history on your side. When the finisher in question is a middleweight, you have to doubt their ability to either stop him, or outpoint him. Also while his power was nothing special for a heavyweight, it seems to have been pretty compelling against middleweight sized fighters.
Essentially the sam size with greater reach, betters skills, sufficient power and a willingness to deliver it. Corbett's fear of black fighters.
I don't think that it is fair to accuse Corbett of being afraid of black fighters, when he fought Peter Jackson, who was the most avoided heavyweight of the era!