A neutral and unbiased view of Ward/Kovalev

Between the 3 of them they came up with all 3 alternatives - a win for Ward, a win for Kovalev and the draw as well.

Only reiterates what we all know. That it was a close fight open to interpretation.

 

Open to interpretation but you had to give everything to ward for him to win by the slimmest of margins.

If kovalev got that treatment he would Have won 117-110.

The fact that not one judge gave sergey a round after round 6 shows there was something up with the scoring

 

You also have to factor in that these Liverpool tards don't have their own voice and just start parroting what the biggest loudmouth says after a while which was smith

I remember the Liverpool yards did the commentary on lebedev vs gassiev and they had lebedev winning comfortably, then acted like they were in complete shock when gassiev won. As much as I like lebedev he got beat fairly cleanly.

These guys can't score a fight to See their lives

 

Hard fight to score, and only further emphasized by the fact that of the 3 judgments offered in the video 2 of them got it wrong.

 

The only one with an agenda is the one making threads on the subject. There are a ton of unbiased opinions on the subject and many of those opinions conflict with each other. Being unbiased doesn't make them right. If you're going to pick and choose those with an opinion that suits your own you probably shouldn't talk about anyone having an agenda.

 

The judges did Kovalev dirty Period .

 

Close fight that was completely open to interpretation.

Nothing posted here or anywhere else will change the result. Why we need thread after thread, day after day on it I'll never know?

Some thought Ward won. Some thought Kovalev won. Time to get over it and move on.

 

Like I said. A lot of "unbiased" opinions and a lot of them conflict. An amazing sample pool of 3 people and you decided to post it on a forum to try and make a point.