***A New, Fair System for Judging P4P***

Just for this forum. I don't care about if other sites use them - but of course they are entitled to do so.

Btw I don't hope you are refering to us as internet junkies, while removing yourself from that equation.

 

Of course he is - he keeps his 10 posts a day in check(which is 2 more than I).

 

No, you are just getting worked over, that we are getting worked over a broken system.

 

Since you are fine with the current system, feel free to use Ring magazines or the like. We find it broken, biased and incomplete.

 

Or more of a junkie?

 

Decebal, what did you think of this: "My suggestion is that we look how complete a boxer is, coupled with whom he has met since the last update."

Maybe it should more specified than Offensive/Defensive skills, then compile a total point for this fighter, coupled with points for last five fights(which are compiled from same system).

 

So far you have been better at humour, but fail at being constructive :tong

 

You are contradicting yourself. First you say they often tend too high rank due hype, and then you say they are well schooled; well schooled guys don't believe in hype, they believe in what they see.