A Question For Klit Fans: Who do you rate higher p4p, Wlad K or Roberto Duran?

**** off with the tongue in cheek bull crap. I can score 100% in the toddler division.
Doesn't mean I can in the major league. Having said that. Wlad hasn't had the chance
to prove himself against great opposition. All in all.. the question isn't as simple as it
seems from either side of the board.

 

But duran never fought no one as skilled as Wladimir, who in my opinion is the GOAT.

Wladimir could move down in weight and he could beat Mayweather, Pacquiao, Donaire, Rigondeaux, Rios and everyone else if he wanted to.

 

We all know this to be factual. Wlads skeleton can kick Chuck Norris's ass
without breaking a sweat. Largely due to lack of sweat glands admittedly.

So what's the point?

 

The point is


If Godzilla existed;


Wlad KO1 Godzilladeal:deal

 

By stating the ultimate truth you just unraveled the very fabric of reality.

Damn.

 

Wlad is better because he doesn't physically assault poor helpless animals.

 

:rofl

 

p4p Wlad >> Godzilla. Huge reach advantage.

 

Duran never beat anyone as big as Wlad.

 

Stupid troll question, but Duran had multiple wars with several ATG fighters to prove himself. I think Wlad is a fantastic fighter, but he has a ceiling on how high he can be rated among ATG fighters due to the absolute trash of opposition around to oppose him. It's not his fault, but that's just how it is.

Also... Wlad TKO5 Godzilla. Have you even seen that reach advantage?? Edit: Ah... Breman beat me too it.

 

Come on, man. A fighter is not just a fighter. So beating Ray Robinson is as impressive as beating Reggie Strickland? This is EXACTLY what you are saying.

It is also very 'silly' to draw an analogy with a sport you can't draw an analogy to. They are completely different sports. You know your argument is a troll argument. Stop being stupid.