A question to those who claim the Klits aren't very good

C'mon, lately his speech is subtitled with good reason.

I don't want to post any speech comparisons but it's not only his speech.

This is after Peter 2 fight where he and doctors speak about the subject.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q8DXiCr3-jE&feature=player_embedded"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q8DXiCr3-jE&feature=player_embedded[/ame]

Sadly I took your advice and watched his last three fights. Not very inspirational material.. Neither James or Rahman has nothing to be proud about their second meeting. First round went to Rahman, second was pretty even and in third, after the headbutt Rahman flips about the blood in his eye and James finally connects with some relatively soft punches. Doctor asks can he see and Rahman answers 'no'.

It wasn't like James battered him to submission. Rahman just was his usual unstable himself.

I'd rather stop watching Toney's career set around the Ruiz fight.

Well, what he answered? Let me guess; he said pretty much the same about Toney as I did? Too shot. Bad for resume. People don't want to see it.

So this

This content is protected

picture doesn't make you want to write some ****?

This content is protected

Go ahead, I know you want to.

 

Thats because apart from Adamek....those challengers are bums too

 

Wlad's got Adamek, Haye and Povetkin on his radar. He will bust them all up. They know it too. Haye and Povetkin have bottled 2x/each against wlad.

I think this strategy of ducking him in hopes he ages isn't valid. I think Wlad's career will last longer than any of these guys. Guys has the hunger and the style built for long-term domination.

 

I believe the best asset both brothers have is their size. Their actual boxing skills, i.e. slipping punches and not backing straight up, aren't at the elite level.

 

It's not the Klitschko's size that matters it's their skills. The prejudice against them makes me want to puke!