A question why is no one calling out Crawford?

Dude, it's okay. Don't let your hate for a man you never met run your life.

 

Android if anyone is the hater here it's you are always ripping on crawford ,Loma ,and mikey. It's as it you scared they will surpass your heros legacy . Look at the difference .look at all the experts lists including everyone on this forum whether they hate/dislike crawford ,Mikey ,Loma .They still rank them top ten p4p something pac is no longer "once upon a Time he was great " that's it's man the story is gone he is done ask anyone here if they still have Pac rated top ten pound per pound as of today ? I'll be surprised if they do . I bet you most on this forum have Mikey ,Loma,and Crawford on top ten and don't have Pac top ten pac just let it go man. He was a great fighter he will go down as one of the greats but you can't be great forever man it's just a new generation.

 

Hate Pac no way man why would I hate on a legend .how am I hating on him by saying he isn't as good ? That's not hate it's just my opinion take it or leave it man your the one getting mad just because I have a difference of opinion

 

Either way good debate android you have good come backs man. But you need to let the emotional part go learn to have a debate without insulting anyone that disagrees with you . You don't rate crawford high ok then I respect your part on that the difference between you and I. Is if someone has a difference of opinion I don't try to force my opinion like you do .

 

Crawford just needs to fight a live body.

 

And I agree

 

Yep aggressive fighters tend to not age well. Look at the Horn fight pac from 5 years earlier would of stopped him in 3

 

ok who is his best win then... his resume sucks unfortunately. And yeah broner would probably be a favorite against every opponent of Bud's career and broner is not that good.

 

Provodnikov took years off of Mathysse he was finished as an elite fighter after that war.

 

Broner wouldn't have been a favorite against Benavidez or Horn and I am sure there are others. It's not about who was Crawford's best win but how he treated every fighter that was put in front of him. We still haven't seen the best of Crawford and that's scary. His resume will only get better when these so-called elite fighters stop talking and sign on the bottom line.

 

Speaking of Provdnikov I miss him he always put on a great fight.

 

Benavidez maybe Horn is trash always has been trash. And yes it is about who you beat if you only fight c- level fighter it's hard to say you are that good as you have never stepped up.

 

People rarely called out PBF when he was the p4p #1 in the world, and fighting him would've netted any contender a lifetime payday. Carlos freaking Baldomir got $1.6 million for the privilege of being on the wrong end of the most lopsided mismatch-in-skills title fight since arguably RJJ vs. Pazienza, but not many others seemed to want to follow in his footsteps. Obviously there were a few, like Margarito and Williams, but you didn't hear every single welterweight screaming for him during every scrap of TV exposure they got. And that was PBF. A date with Crawford isn't a fraction as lucrative, and you're still taking a humiliating beating if you're pretty much anyone in his weight range.

 

You can call them what you want too but it don't erase the fact that they would most like beat Broner. There is no doubt in any boxing persons mind that Crawford is an elite fighter with the resume he has right now. He is at the top of the P4P list. It's not only who you fight but also who don't want none. That speaks volumes.