A Real Legitimate World Title??

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Old Greg, Sep 17, 2013.


  1. Old Greg

    Old Greg Member Full Member

    498
    0
    Mar 7, 2011
    As you may of seen Scott Quigg had his interim title upgraded to the regular version of the WBA strap.

    So do you consider Scott Quigg a legitimate World Title holder as Rigondeax holds the WBA (Super) Super Bantamweight title.
     
  2. Terminator_X

    Terminator_X Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,796
    3
    Apr 5, 2013
    The WBA Champion is Guillermo Rigondeaux.

    Scott Quigg's WBA title is completely meaningless, anyone who thinks he's a real world champion in any way even after his fight with Yoandris Salinas is deluded.
     
  3. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ

    94,712
    29,643
    Jan 18, 2010
    As legit as Povetkin's WBA Heavyweight belt.

    In other words, meaningless.
     
  4. tdf1974

    tdf1974 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,132
    2,354
    Sep 9, 2013
    regardless what you call this belt its only a matter of time until Quigg is a bonafide World Champion.. I am hoping of very big things from Quigg for a long time .seems to have it all to me
     
  5. JW1989

    JW1989 Member Full Member

    216
    0
    Sep 5, 2012
    As the WBA have "Super" Champions then I see the "Regular" belt just being an interim title, to me its as much of a World Title as the WBC "Silver" belts.

    One organisation should have one World Champion. Simple. So if Quigg hasn't beat Rigo then he's not the WBA's Super-Bantamweight Champion...
     
  6. Sonny1

    Sonny1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,313
    4,170
    Mar 11, 2013
  7. Box4life

    Box4life Member Full Member

    282
    0
    Jul 19, 2011
  8. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,179
    Oct 22, 2006
    The WBA get to decide their title holders, thus any decision is 'legitimate' in that context. As for 'real'; that is an abstract term...
     
  9. MyName

    MyName Simon Adebisi Full Member

    1,746
    3
    Mar 18, 2012
    Rigondeaux is the 122 lb champ.

    The rest are contenders and so forth.
     
  10. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,179
    Oct 22, 2006
    I would agree Rigondeaux is currently the best of the lot, but that does not mean Quigg cannot be a title holder...
     
  11. Old Greg

    Old Greg Member Full Member

    498
    0
    Mar 7, 2011
    The top one from each of the WBC, WBA, IBF and WBO in my view can say they are real, proper, legitimate champs, any more than one from each organisation is just going too far.
     
  12. UndisputedUK

    UndisputedUK Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,152
    2
    Feb 20, 2006
    It's a world title, WBA. It doesn't mean he's the best in the division. At the moment it's just one of the belts among the others. It's his time to build on this and become a great fighter.
     
  13. Furey

    Furey EST & REG 2009 Full Member

    16,714
    6,843
    Oct 18, 2009
  14. Glenmax777

    Glenmax777 Member Full Member

    329
    0
    Jul 3, 2011
    Not a chance is it legitimate. WBA are a total disgrace and a stain on boxing.
     
  15. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,179
    Oct 22, 2006
    How do you define 'the top one'?

    Why do you only include the WBA, WBC, WBO and IBF?

    What do you mean by 'real', 'proper' and 'legitimate'?