Certainly not nearly as many as Harold Lederman had Hatton winning. Lederman scoring rationale hinged on whether or not each round reflected his preconceived idea of Hatton's style. That's unbelievably stupid. Preconceived ideas of styles have no room in scoring boxing matches. I gave Hatton 1 round, maybe 2. Glad the official judges saw it that way too.
This . 3 rounds tops. But then Mayweather fans will tell you he adjusted to Hatton at some point, even tho he dominated the fight pretty much from the opening bell.
Round 5 is the only round I gave to Hatton. Mayweather's defense was just too good the rest of the rounds and he landed pretty much all of the clean shots.
I haven't seen it in a while but I don't remember Hatton clearly winning a round. FMJ did look a bit shaky at times during the first few rds. due to Hatton's rush in & wrestle style.
Here you are again trying to diminish Floyd's ability to adapt. Hatton did pretty well in the beginning, but Floyd made some adjustments and Hatton never did. I gave Hatton the first two rounds, then Floyd took the last seven without scoring the tenth round. What is your reasoning for Hatton holding his own in the beginning, then suddenly getting dominated?