A Savage Uncompromising Appraisal Of Where The Current Canelo And Golovkin Are Truly At.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by CST80, Jun 6, 2017.


  1. ElCyclon

    ElCyclon Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,967
    13,202
    Dec 2, 2012

    You're either re tarded or have not heard that this fight is taking place.
     
  2. LANCE99

    LANCE99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,556
    6,352
    Mar 11, 2016
    Great....another attention seeking *****. All this site needs more of...
     
  3. Serge

    Serge Ginger Dracula Staff Member

    79,341
    129,500
    Jul 21, 2009
    This content is protected
     
  4. alexland

    alexland student of the sweet science Full Member

    483
    553
    Mar 20, 2017
    i predict Canello will be doing his own chicken dance inside the ring
     
    CST80 likes this.
  5. qwertyblahblah

    qwertyblahblah Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,985
    2,063
    Jan 14, 2013
    I have to say I do see it similarly. Though Canelo wasn't getting embarrassed by Khan, it was an even bout at worst and Canelo put on an exhibition of timing and distance maintenance, and I don't see the relevance of how Canelo has performed against backfoot movers. I think he's shown he can handle backfoot movers better than Golovkin, but that's beside the point. The point is that GOLOVKIN'S problem is with movers. Guys who have foot and handspeed, throw in combination, and don't stay in front of him. That of course was Jacobs. And Charlo sticking to a good gameplan might present the same difficulty.

    But Canelo is a measured counterpuncher. And a guy whose worst flaw is his slow feet, and who fights at a careful pace with only bursts of activity, when opportunities are there. Those opportunities won't be there for Canelo. No way he can jab with GGG, use his upper body to avoid punches, and counter like he has with recent opponents. GGG with his educated jab, his short punches, and hounding Canelo while cutting off the ring won't be there for Canelo. I think Canelo could have impressive moments and win some rounds, but he'll simply be a much easier target for GGG than GGG's most difficult opponents, like Jacobs and Brook. Is Canelo going to suddenly be sidestepping all night to stay away from GGG's attack?

    Canelo will be taking stiff jabs and punishing blows even when he lands occasional counters and a rare 1-2. By halfway GGG will be dishing out a fair beating and Canelo will be pretty clueless. I just don't see how Canelo has the style to win this. And oh yeah he's never fought anyone who punches anywhere near as hard as Golovkin.
     
    Last edited: Jun 8, 2017
    Swollen Liver, alexland and CST80 like this.
  6. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,540
    18,217
    Oct 7, 2006
    This place is going to be awfully quiet on Sept. 16
     
  7. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    242,353
    235,906
    Nov 23, 2013
    Yep, all the loudmouth Canelo fans will be nowhere to be seen.
     
    BCS8 likes this.
  8. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,540
    18,217
    Oct 7, 2006
    Because you ban them every time they school your sorry moderating "butt".

    Im surprised the owner of this site keeps you as a mod.
     
  9. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    242,353
    235,906
    Nov 23, 2013
    No, I didn't ban you for schooling anyone, because you didn't school anyone you delusional cretin. You violated the word filter while arguing with another mod, how ****ing stupid are you anyway?
     
  10. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,540
    18,217
    Oct 7, 2006
    I didn't violate anything, you just abuse the authority that was entrusted to you when it suits you.

    Asking what network a fight is on is a bannable offense in your opinion? And no, it was not asked im any other context than what was asked.

    You suck at moderating, way too bias and emotional. Ive been here since 2002 and your on par with with some terrible mod named Carlosv1968. You guys are insecure weasels who get too emotionally invested with certain male fighters.
     
  11. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    242,353
    235,906
    Nov 23, 2013
    Yes you did violate the word filter, you used the s word (that is a bannable offense) while you were attacking Kirk for being an unfit mod. That seems to be a pattern with you, someone disagrees with you, you cry like a little ****** and say they're biased and too emotional, the only one here that's biased and emotional is your Canelo obsessed fruity ass. I never ban anyone for asking what network a fight is on you idiot, I usually offer the info up on the front page of the RBR's. I abuse nothing, you are a fanboy and a ****ing crybaby, now be quiet.
     
    theanatolian likes this.
  12. alexland

    alexland student of the sweet science Full Member

    483
    553
    Mar 20, 2017
    look man, i don't know you, i'm just trying to help: just let it go.

    as far as this context goes,

    mods are gods

    they're also human and they won't use their discretion in your favor if you provoke them

    insightful posts and meaningful contribution to what is on balance an awesome on-line Community here and you know as well as i that the mods will let you be
     
    Last edited: Jun 9, 2017
  13. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    59,761
    79,729
    Aug 21, 2012
    :facepalm: Isal is heading straight for the waterfall again. Calm down, dude.
     
  14. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,540
    18,217
    Oct 7, 2006
    The only pattern here is you abusing your mod status. I disagree with many members, and we discuss our different perspectives and its enjoyable most of the time.

    If we compare our posts you are far more biased and if anyone is a fruit for a fighter its you with your constant Golovkin nut swinging.

    I dare you to find some outrageous comment I've made, you won't because there is none.

    Hopefully you get a job soon so you can spend less time ruining this site.
     
  15. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,540
    18,217
    Oct 7, 2006

    Let what go? Lol. Its just a rant bro, but thanks for the concern.