A tribute to the KING

Tito would be simply too big and too devastating of a puncher for Pacquiao. Logic says that he wins by ko. Then again since when did Pacquiao follow logic

I'll pick Tito for sure but I'll never bet against Pacquiao even if he was facing some gigantic monster. The man would have cost me too much money had I simply followed logic in his fights.

 

I loved watching Tito fight great champion.

 

I'm a Pacquiao fan but your an idiot if you think Manny could beat Trinidad.

 

Thing I've learnt today:

Tito was an underrated body-puncher.

Thing I already knew: He was an offensive beast and a truly murderous puncher.

 

Pac by KO in 3

Trinidad was a slow starter.

 

Don't worry, Cotto is Julio Cesar Chavez's illegitimate son. :yep

 

Give it up to the man!


[yt]zRu3tw9fYxE[/yt]

 

Whats wrong?....
I'm just stating the facts man...
I know hes your idol but damn...
Anyway its hard to believe that the title "king" goes with this guy.....Sorry!:hi:

 

Im not a *******, and yeah, prime pac destroys prime tito. I like them both but pac is just too good.

 

obviously tito would have the advantages because he is a full blown welter- light middle. p4p pac is better though.

 

At this stage Pac does extremely well agaisnt aggressive come forward type guys.

 

Hell nah, for starters Chavez' chin makes Cotto's look like a soft boiled egg, and second Chavez would never bow down to another fighter in his prime like Cotto did.

 

So Pac by decision or KO?