A Truer Hall of Fame/Greatness

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by TBooze, Aug 15, 2011.


  1. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,150
    Oct 22, 2006
    I think overall the Hall of Fame in Canastota is of great benefit to the sport and a fun weekend, when fans can meet some brilliant boxing people. But like other Hall of Fames, as the quantity of fighters increases year on year, the quality is diluted.

    So just for a bit of fun, I have created a stricter Queensberry Rules Hall of Fame, with the following criterion.

    The hypothetical Hall of Fame was created in January 1942

    Once a decade a vote would be held to vote in one member:

    A fighter who fought in the 20th Century and had retired 30 years previous.

    So here my picks, based on this criterion:

    January 1942 (for fighters who have to of been retired prior to 1-1-1912): Joe Gans
    January 1952 (for fighters who have to of been retired prior to 1-1-1922): Bob Fitzsimmons
    January 1962 (for fighters who have to of been retired prior to 1-1-1932): Harry Greb
    January 1972 (for fighters who have to of been retired prior to 1-1-1942): Jimmy Wilde
    January 1982 (for fighters who have to of been retired prior to 1-1-1952): Henry Armstrong
    January 1992 (for fighters who have to of been retired prior to 1-1-1962): Joe Louis
    January 2002 (for fighters who have to of been retired prior to 1-1-1972): Ray Robinson
    January 2012 (for fighters who have to of been retired prior to 1-1-1982): Muhammad Ali

    I suspect if this were real, Louis would of got in, in 82, and Armstrong would of got in, in 92. Also Moore has been unlucky, no one but Robinson could of got the 2002 slot, and Ali edges Moore, Charles and Burley for later this year.

    So, what are your picks?
     
  2. lora

    lora Fighting Zapata Full Member

    10,305
    544
    Feb 17, 2010
    No Dave McAuley or Duke McKenzie:yep
     
  3. sugarsean

    sugarsean Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,496
    14
    Jun 2, 2009
    terrible system, the current system might not be perfect but its a lot lot better than a system that only has 7 fighters in it after 70 years from its opening.
     
  4. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,150
    Oct 22, 2006
    Sadly, they do not qualify.:|
     
  5. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,150
    Oct 22, 2006
    It would be eight fighters after seventy years.;)

    It is not commercially a viable system, but it is a way of truly only recognizing the very special fighters...