Jermain Taylor's resume "takes a massive ****" on Pacquiao's resume. No, you did read it right. Radab said: Jermain Taylor's resume "takes a massive ****" on Pacquiao's resume. When will this ludicrous Pacquiao hating from the Trampies and the Nalleges and the Radabs ever end???? It's just absurd now. Jermain Taylor?!?! :nut (I wish something would take a massive **** on Radab for fouling up a boxing forum with this nightmare of a comment.) :good
I suppose beating Bhop as he was p4p number 1 at the time is more impressive in terms of a single victory. He did this twice. However in terms of depth there is simply no argument.
To say his resume shits on Pac's is a comment on the resume as a whole though, clearly. And it's an awful, utterly unjustifiable, horribly biased and idiotic comment. (ps: taylor didn't win the 1st hopkins fight!! jmo)
Who is criticizing his resume? Certainly not me. But to say it shits all over Pacquiao's is just absolute garbage. No?
true... put each fighters best 5 6 or 7 wins next to each other and compare and contrast... i never really looked at it beore
I wouldn't say Taylor's resume shits all over Manny's, but Jermain has a damn impressive string of fighter's he's fought over the years so comparing the two isn't very absurd.
Do that, and Pacquiao's is clearly better. But that's not really how you evaluate entire resumes. Pacquiao has been beating world-level opposition since the late 90s, he has had 7 fights with the 3 great Mexicans alone, he has beaten champions from fly to north of light. To even suggest Taylor's resume is better is sheer lunacy.
Rabab is another clown in this a forum . . . don't bother yourself . . . don't glorify the joker . . . the guy has no credibilty. :deal
You're right of course. I only just saw that comment and thought it deserved ridicule though. The guy is a bad joke.
I guess so, but I've heard much worse before. No sense in paying much attention to a troll's nonsense comments.