A work in progress, how does Vitlai Klitschko rate as an ATG heavyweight?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Mendoza, Feb 8, 2009.


  1. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. Full Member

    55,255
    10,362
    Jun 29, 2007
    This content is protected



    Who are the all time greats at heavyweight? The top 14 should include Ali, Louis, Holmes, Jeffries, Liston, Dempsey, Foreman, Johnson, Marciano, Lewis, Bowe, Tyson, Frazier and Holyfield. I would argue that all the above names should never be below 20, and in almost all cases should be top 15. So, if these are 14 consensus names. That would leave 1 open spots to complete the top 15.

    There are two ways to rank all time fighters. Head to head vs the field, or what they accomplished in their own era.

    Let’s look at head to head first. Head to head, I believe Vitali is a top 20 all time heavyweight. Many past great heavyweights were really cruisers or light heavies that lacked the power, size and durability to defeat Vitali in the ring. In a head to head sense, Vitali should rate over Corbett, Fitzsimmons, Chalres, Walcott, Patterson, Ingo, Spinks, ect….Those guys. As a footnote, Vitali fought two fighters who fought as cruisers / heavies. They were Norris and Hide. They lasted a combined 3 rounds.

    Accomplishments in their own era is different. Tunney, Bowe, and Liston did not have long title reigns, yet they rate highly. Vitali fought in a fragment era where politics prevented re-matches. He did not choose to build his legacy on washed up has been’s such as Tyson, Holyfield, Bowe or Moorer, but he could have easily knocked them all out in the late 1990's / early 2000's. Instead his legacy is based on various feats. Let us examine these accomplishments and pit them vs the best heavyweights in ring history.

    Vitali's winning percentage was 94.73%. He owns the best all time knockout percentage of all heavyweight champions at 92.11%. He has the best ratio of rounds won to rounds lost, never being behind on any score card after round three. He was never being floored by a punch in his entire career. He fought the least amount of guys .500 or below. He threw lots of punches for a heavyweight. He also mounted an all time come back at age 37, taking almost four year off, and with no warm up fight beat on the #2 Ring Magazine Ranked heavyweight in the world. When someone presents a list in sports, one of the first questions asked should be, who else in on the list. And to be fair, I will only compare former great fighter in their prime or near prime years.

    1 ) Vitlai knocked a higher percentage of guys out, even over Foreman, Marciano, Dempsey, Tyson, and Lewis. In fact Vitlai's knock out percentage ( 92.11% ) is the highest of any gloved champion in the history of the ring.

    Others who rate below Vitlai Klitschko include:

    Rocky Marciano 87.75 KO Percentage
    George Foreman 83.99 KO Percentage
    Mike Tyson 78.47 KO Percentage
    Joe Louis 77.46 KO Percentage
    Sonny Liston 77.20 KO Percentage.

    2 ) Vitali dominated the score cards and had the best rounds won to round lost ratio in heavyweight boxing history…. even over guys like Ali, and Holmes. This is special as even Ali and Holmes lost their share of rounds to lesser guys. It tells me that Vitali's size, skills, power, work rate, speed, and style completely forced other fighters off their games. Outboxing Vitali was not an option the 37 fighters he faced. It is estimated that Vitlai won 150 of 156 rounds in his career--give or take say two rounds. Ok—Let’s be conservative and say he won 149 and lost 7. That is still 95.51% of the rounds won. Even the prime Ali in the 1960's lost several more rounds than 7, and to be honest his competition from 1964-1967 had several men on it below the levels of Lennox Lewis, Sam Peter, and Chris Byrd.

    Others who lost more rounds than Vitlai in their prime years in just a few fights alone include:

    The after mentioned Muhammad Ali, in his prime years.
    Joe Louis in both his fights with either Pastor of Walcott.
    Larry Holmes in his fight with Norton and Witherpsoon
    Lennox Lewis in his fights vs a slightly past his prime Holyfield
    Gene Tunney in fights with Loughran and any 1 fight with Greb.
    Joe Frazier in fights with Buster Mathis and Ocsar Bonnevena.


    3 ) Vitali was never floored by a punch in his career. Only one other man can claim this, and his chin was not tested by bombs the way Vitali’s was. Vitlai took flush shots to the chin, temple and head by big punchers such as Lewis, Sanders, and Hide. It is said that a good chin is the most important asset for a heavyweight. Vitali did not have a good chin, he had a great chin.

    Here a list great fighters, and how many times they were down in their prime years. To be honest, many of these men where floored by lesser punchers.

    Ali 3x
    Lewis 2x.
    Liston 2x
    Marciano 2x
    Holmes 3x
    Foreman 4x
    Louis 6x


    4 ) Vitali has less tomato cans ( guys .500 or below when he fought them ) on his record in comparison all champions except for one.

    This content is protected



    5 ) Vitlai had a second rate promoter and an unknown trainer. A good team can make a difference. Would Louis and Ali be as good without Blackburn and Dundee? I think not.

    6 ) Vitlai came back at age 37 after a near 4 year layoff, then won a title with no warm up fights vs the #2 heavyweight in the world in Sam Peter. Vitlai did not lose a round.

    The list of heavyweight who won their title back after age 37 is only one man, George Foreman, but to be honest Foreman was 0-2 in his first two tries, losing to Holyfield and Tommy Morrison before catching a less than durable Michael Moorer late.
    This content is protected


    Can anyone else in history match or exceed these accomplishments in their own eras? I think not.

    Even in a so-called weaker era, these facts / feats are hard to ignore.

    Vitlai had two losses. Let’s talk about them for a moment. The Byrd fight was a fluke loss. Vitali was basically beating Byrd with one good working arm. Perhaps if the stakes were higher or if he was thinking legacy at the time, he would have pressed on. But Vitlai lost feeling in his arm and could not lift it up anymore. He feared for his career, which at that point lacked mega paydays. So he retired while up by a 7-2 margin on the cards. Byrd is a champion and pretty good fighter who happened to be in his prime when the match happened. Without a fluke injury, Vitali wins this fight. I do not hold this loss against him. No one in a fantasy match up says, who would win, Frazier with a torn left shoulder or Quarry? Some hold Vitali quitting against him. This is fair as long as the person saying this is willing to concede that legends such as Roberto Duran, Jose Napoles, Jack Johnson, Sugar Ray Robinson, Henry Armstrong, Mike Tyson, Joe Gans, Bob Foster, Sam Langford, Marcel Cerdan, Willie Pep, Kosta Tszyu, Alexis Arguello Ezzard Chalres, Jake Lamotta, Archie Moore and about 100 other guys at one point retired or quit. To quote Ali, most people can get up but choose not to. I will skip the portion of fighters who basically gave up.

    The Lewis fight was interesting. Vitlai was up 4-2 on all cards. This means Lewis, an older fighter who was gassed and forced to fight at a quick pace would need to win four of the next six rounds on at least two cards to produce a draw. Lewis never scored a TKO past round 8, and like many older fighters decided it was time to go for a Ko before he ran out of gas. The fight was stopped on a cut that was not bleeding at the time, and was not impairing Vitali’s vision. It was a doctor’s call to stop the fight, not Vitali’s. Who knows what would have happened in rounds 7-12. I tend to believe Vitlai would win late. Either way, Lewis is an all time great. Vitlai wanted re-matches. Lewis and Byrd did not despite a huge amount of guaranteed money. In addition Vitali took both the Byrd and Lewis fights on less than two weeks notice. A re-match offer of $18,000,000.00 to Lennox Lewis was offered. Lewis had to the take this huge sum of cash, or lose his title. He wisely opted to retire instead of the real risk of going out a loser.

    Conclusion:

    Vitlai Klitschko certainly belongs in the conversation of all time top 20 heavyweights, and should be considered a top 15 heavyweight. In addition to the above, he stands 6'7 1/2" tall, weighs in at a fit 245-250 pounds, and sports an 80" reach.
     
  2. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,759
    2,324
    Aug 26, 2004
    Ita shame he lost those 3 years because he was really developing skillwise after Lewis. I feel he was confident and improving. I think he would have dominated the division, he destroyed Johnson,Williams,Sanders and would have done so to the rest. He has a tough fight ahead in stinker Gomez and a few tough matches ahead should he get past them but he is hovering top 10 should he be able to hold up a bit...he is going to be remembered how he finishes...good or bad
     
  3. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. Full Member

    55,255
    10,362
    Jun 29, 2007
    That is a good point. He lost three of his prime years.
     
  4. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,376
    309
    Jan 8, 2009
    vitali has a short prime
     
  5. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    279
    Oct 4, 2005
    Gomez is going to be a tough one. Those Cubans are damn good boxers and Juan Carlos has excellent handspeed. I think Vitali will have to turn it into a fight with a high pressure style, which he usually adopts... in an unorthodox style.
     
  6. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    52,088
    27,432
    Jan 3, 2007
    I just got through studying 4 chapters of law. No way am I breaking down all that.


    Nice job though. I skimmed through it, and I've discussed many of those points with you and others before. I concur that Vitali's win/ko ration coupled with his claim to having the best winning round percentage and his comeback win over Peter should place him somewhere in the top 20 or so. My only problem is that he really had no wins over anyone that we can truly call a legitimately good fighter. Sam Peter and a 38 year old Corrie Sanders may well be the best fighters he ever defeated. . The Peter win was a good one from the standpoint that Vitali was 37 years old and hadn't fought in some 4 years. The problem with the win, was that he was fighting a man who did not appear to be trained as a champion. Peter looked more deconditioned than Tony Tubbs did in 1986, and was arguably held in far lesser regard. Corrie Sanders was 38, off for 13 months, and the only signature win he had ever recorded was over Vitali's brother......

    V Klitshcko is a very good fighter, but his comp inhibits him from reaching the upper tier of the division, and saying that his size and KO percentage would earn him automatic "W's" against past greats doesn't cut it for me....

    I place Klit above just about any fragment holder that ever lived in any era, but place him well below most of the more respectable lineal champs. He had great ability but as mentioned before, he doesn't have the names in the win column.
     
  7. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. Full Member

    55,255
    10,362
    Jun 29, 2007
    I don't think Gomez is going to be easy. I don't think it will be hard either.

    Gomez is similar to Larry Donald. Vitali's work rate will have Gomez on the run, and unless Gomez can keep balance and land going backwards, I can not see him winning many rounds.
     
  8. downthatbottle

    downthatbottle Please don't ban me Full Member

    828
    0
    Dec 8, 2008
    It's a shame that he used to kickbox instead of box.

    He probably wouldn't have had all those injuries.

    It doesn't help his case that he has Wlad as a brother (boxing terms of course).

    He could have been a very, very dominant heavyweight.
     
  9. Asterion

    Asterion Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,459
    20
    Feb 5, 2005
    Mainly because of his great comeback and because of the toe-to-toe basis, I think he can be ranked in the Top30.
     
  10. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,334
    30,115
    Jun 2, 2006
    A good Champion but NOT AN ALL TIME GREAT.ps It's VITALI.or VITALY,but NOT VITLAI.
     
  11. gregor

    gregor Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,962
    3
    Dec 3, 2005
    What are you talking about? The only rematch which could affect Vitali achievements would be with Lewis, and he simply retired. I fail to see any influence of politics or "fragmented era" here. Maybe what you meant was that in another ere (say, 50 years ago) Lewis would be fighting well into his 40s, and in this case I have no doubt Vitali would win with him as many times as possible.

    That is really nice way of saying that he didn't want to fight them when they were close(r) to their primes. Let's start with reminding that Vitali started boxing in 1996, with good amateur background.

    In similar circumstances, Holyfield needed only 6 years to completely dominate CW, move to heavy and get THE BELT. Tyson was even faster. Respectively, Vitali was able to look great against mediocre opposition, lose to the first top fighter he met (Byrd) and to the only (past-prime) ATG he met. Then he retired, and after long layoff he won a title from Sam Peter, who was considered nr 2 at this time. It is also known that Vitali will never fight nr 1. Did I miss anything important?

    BTW, what you said about Vitali not wanting to fight washed up fighters is in the first place not true. Do you remember that Vitali wanted to fight Tyson as late as in 2004? Unfortunately, he was not fast enough and Williams did the job.

    To start with, you skipped the fact that Vitali was never THE HEAVYWEIGHT CHAMPION. Anyway, winning percentage and KO percentage mean anything only when compared with quality of opponents, and if you insist on comparing Vitali with HW champions, this comparison doesn't look good for Vitali. You may argue that some of them, like Foreman, also fought quite a number of tomato cans, but it is not their main achievement.

    The same about other best ratio's, never losing a round, etc. I can admit he has good chin, but I still do not think it is enough to make him ATG.

    Boxers nowadays are just much more careful with their records, so they more guys with padded records available. Klitschko fought guys like Dicky Ryan (46-3) or Mario Schiesser (36-3-1). It may look similar to Foreman-Lyle (31-3-1) and better than Foreman-Chuvalo (59-15-2), but only on paper.

    I feel Vitali supporters are deliberately using the arguments based on KO's ratio, never losing a round, and so on. It is probably supposed to somehow replace the real achievements (or rather, their lack).
     
  12. zadfrak

    zadfrak Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,699
    3,380
    Feb 17, 2008
    He's definately a guy that is going to be very very difficult to ever look good against. And the way he utilizes his size in the ring forces the opponent to fight a Vitali fight and not the bout they'd prefer to box. Plus, the guy is always in shape and throws nothing but combos and uses his feet in there. It's going to take somebody with a lot of tools to deal with that & that's a reason many of the older name heavies didn't sign to fight the guy.

    That risk vs. reward factor is far more beneficial facing other opponents than a Vitali Klitschko. The only guy who was willing to fight him was Byrd and he'd sign to fight anyone anytime and anywhere. And just how many other managers were willing to even put their guy in with a youthful Byrd? Let alone on a 1 week notice when you'd been training for the polar opposite stylewise in Ruddock. Just exactly how many other guys would be signing that contract anyway?

    Vitali took real short money for that Lewis bout. Most guys are going to insist on a lot more $$$ to take on a Lennox Lewis and the bout doesn't even transpire. So here you have Vitali in his 2 losses in fights nobody else but Byrd would've signed for. And that's how most guys get and keep their lofty records==by not fighting the risky bouts.
     
  13. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. Full Member

    55,255
    10,362
    Jun 29, 2007
    The only match?? I disagree. The re-match with Byrd would have helped. Understand this; Don King who controlled Byrd did not want the re-match.
    Lennox Lewis did not want the re-match either. Vitlai wants either Chagaev or Valeuv in the ring. He cannot get either fight. A boxer cannot control the politics working against him.



    Vitlai started boxing in as a professional in 1996. By the year 2000, who among Bowe, Holyfield, Morrer, or Tyson was in his prime. As Champion Vitlai could have took an easy payday vs these guy but didn't. Well-- he was going to fight Tyson next but Danny Williams upset Tyson, so WIlliams became his next opponent. If you were honest in evlauting career, many all time greats beat their best opponents before or after the opponents hit their prime.

    Holyfield beat a fat and unmotivated Buster Douglas who opted to take the count. Then he nearly was Ko'd by Bert Cooper, lost on points to Mike Morrer, did not look good vs Bean, and was defeated by Byrd. Holyfield's career is best defined by a TKO and DQ win over Mike Tyson, a gift draw vs Lennox Lewis, and losing the series to Riddick Bowe.


    That is your opinion. In the history of the lineal belt when the champion retired, the two men fighting for the last belt he held became champion. Its true.


    Ring Magazine named Vitali their champion, and other influential power brokers such as ESPN referred to Vitlai as linear champion. All three party ranking systems, such as Ring Magazine, Box Rec, and Fight News had Vitlai #1 across the board at the same time. In a politically frangment world of boxing, this is as good as it gets.

    Regarding KO Percentage, Vitlai stopped plenty of tough cookies. Donald, Purrity, Bean, and Peter. Stopping then was not easy. The reason Vitlai's KO percentage is the all time high is because of his physical tool set, punch out put, and ring general ship. It is not all power. Foreman was a huge puncher, but he had a small gas tank, was not very smart in the ring, and did not land his shots with great accuracy.


    Please explain to me why ATG's clearly lost rounds to lesser competition, whereas Vital did not. It has to be ability.


    Do you think my point of Vitlai doing it with a 2nd rate promtoer and trainer has merrit? I would not compare Ryan or Schiesser to Ron Lyle, however I would compare how quickly Vitlai beat Ryan and Schiesser to the rest of the field who fought them.

    Facts are facts. I'm not saying Vitlai is a top 5 ATG. This thread is a work in progress. I am saying top 20 for sure, likely top 15 when he's finished.
     
  14. Doppleganger

    Doppleganger Southside Slugger Full Member

    1,920
    372
    Dec 30, 2005
    I really like and admire Vitali as a fighter and I feel he would give any ATG in history a rough ride. The things that really prevent him from being considered great (as yet) is his resume and the fact that his brother is also a dominant champion. If he remains active for the next 2-3 years and beats everyone put in front of him then that will help from a dominance perspective.

    But he'll never fight his brother and unless Wlad loses and then retires he'll a) never be truly dominant and b) he'll have to share the best opponents with said brother. That does hurt his career and it's just bad luck for Vitali that he's fighting under those particular circumstances. If Vitali had been active in the 70s, 80s or even 90s I think things might have been different. For example, I give Vitali a good shot against Frazier, Foreman and yes, post-exile Ali too, though the last fight would undoubtedly be his toughest.
     
  15. Ted Stickles

    Ted Stickles Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,248
    2,188
    Jun 24, 2007
    your only as good as the people you fight and win against and unfortunately Vitali has had some slim pickings....His most famous fight was a loss to Lewis....While i like him better than Wlad id say hes in the top 30