A young Miguel Cotto vs. Edwin Valero at 140

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by KOTF, May 23, 2010.


  1. Hyland

    Hyland Pimp C's Father Full Member

    1,380
    139
    Sep 19, 2009
    Miguel Cotto is WAY to skilled and Valero has never faced anyone like him in his career, hence why he gets a away with his sloppy mistakes where a good counter guy like Cotto can easily capitalize and end the fight vio TKO in 5 rounds.
     
  2. Beenie

    Beenie Evolve already! Full Member

    19,105
    42
    Apr 12, 2008

    +1
     
  3. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    60,376
    241
    Sep 28, 2007
  4. Pax

    Pax Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,480
    0
    Apr 21, 2010
    cotto would win, but seriously let valero rip.
     
  5. Pound4poundx

    Pound4poundx Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,292
    0
    Mar 25, 2008
    Valero by mid round stoppage.
     
  6. fatdrunkenslob

    fatdrunkenslob Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,496
    0
    Nov 8, 2005
    Cotto's chin was very shaky down at 140. Corley a tiny LWW without much power was able to put him on ***** street for most of the round. I have no doubt Valero would have destroyed Cotto at 140lbs early in the fight something that crude brawler Torres almost managed on short notice.
     
  7. MrPR

    MrPR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,197
    34
    Mar 23, 2009
    a fight between Cotto vs. Valero should be an action packed fight

    I think it would be a close fight,But i would lean towards Valero by a little..

    Cotto had Chin problems at 140,he got hurt and stunn occasionally at that weight

    and we all know Valero isnt exactly feather fisted

    Valero by TKO mid round
     
  8. Antwuan Maxx

    Antwuan Maxx Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,248
    2
    Apr 23, 2006
    Cotto wasn't chinny at 140 until he had issues making weight, which started around the Bailey fight.

    People seem to forget, Valero was a natural super featherweight and didn't seemingly pack as big of punch at lightweight as he had at 130. At 140, I'm sure his power would have been even less impressive. Valero hit Antonio DeMarco with some huge shots, but never at any point did DeMarco seem in serious trouble, and this was the same DeMarco who was wobbled by Anges Ajaho. At his best (say Sosa/Pinto), I'd say Cotto would stop Valero in the mid to late rounds in a fight of the year candidate. But I do think Valero would have had an excellent chance to KO the Cotto who fought Malignaggi.
     
  9. boxer1025

    boxer1025 Guest

    Some people just dont understand how good Edwin Valero was! :cool:
     
  10. Auracle21

    Auracle21 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,998
    5
    Jan 13, 2008
    I understand he was an amazing fighter. but he had not been in the ring with someone as skilled and versatile as cotto was at that time. needless to say RIP to the great Valero.
     
  11. JMP

    JMP Champion Full Member

    18,768
    21
    Dec 5, 2007
    Valero was no great fighter. Cotto is no great fighter, but he was clearly better than Valero, who was sloppy, not all that skilled, and wouldn't have all-that-impressive power at 140. Cotto that fought bailey would've beat his ass down.
     
  12. JMP

    JMP Champion Full Member

    18,768
    21
    Dec 5, 2007
    Newsflash: he wasn't that good. His best wins were over Vicente Mosquera, Antonio Pitalua, and Antonio DeMarco. **** like this irritates me. Now Valero's going to be built up like Tony Ayala jr - only worse because of his record...and he wasn't even as impressive to me as Ayala.
     
  13. boxer1025

    boxer1025 Guest

    Thats your opinion... I have my own opinion on Valero! The kid had an intensity I have never seen, People grossly under rate his boxing skills as well!
     
  14. esconore

    esconore Active Member Full Member

    1,484
    0
    Jun 3, 2009
    wtf this board is delusional...Cotto would've made light work of Valero, KO7 tops
     
  15. realdeal561

    realdeal561 Boxing Addict banned

    5,991
    1
    Jun 20, 2009
    lol!:lol: