Definitely Pryor. He's the worst possible matchup for Locche. I dont see how Locche mounts enough offense to deter Pryor, and Aaron wouldnt be discouraged by missing. He'd continue attacking, and from odd angles that Locche doesnt anticipate. I think Pryor stops him late.
Pryor's relentless pressure is way too much. Locche might have some moments but Pryor grinds him down.
Pryor will be made to look stupid at times but Locche just doesn't have the offence or work rate to win. Pryor wins a UD or late stoppage.
Pryor's style would give Locche a lot of showcase moments defensively, but Nicolino's lack of offense would see him outworked and maybe dropped en route to a wide points verdict for Aaron.
Loche is the best defensive boxer of all time. He didn't have a great offense, but I still favor him.
Locche was far more skilled than Pryor and would make Pryor miss with most of his shots, I feel Locche would land enough counter hooks to out-point Pryor.
Pryor by decision. Locche woeful offensively and Pryor could box and swarm, so he'd win enough rounds by activity alone even if Locche would be too defensively astute at times. If held in Argentina Locche would win a decision...
