Aaron Pryor vs. Roberto Duran

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Luigi1985, Sep 12, 2007.


  1. Luigi1985

    Luigi1985 Cane Corso Full Member

    4,632
    30
    Feb 23, 2006
    Who wins at 140 lbs and why?
     
  2. Lefty Supremacy

    Lefty Supremacy Member Full Member

    192
    2
    Mar 19, 2007
    Duran is all kinds of wrong for Pryor.
     
  3. istmeno

    istmeno Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,664
    5
    Oct 6, 2006
    pryor gets the brakes beaten off of him. pryor was a good fighter, but gets seriously overrated. his best wins were against a way out of his weight class arguello, and a way beyond his prime pambele.
    arguello gave pryor all he could handle in the first fight, and as much as i love alexis, he was no duran. nobody who catches punches like pryor did ever beats duran.
     
  4. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
    Roberto Duran by unanimous decision

    I think he was a better all around fighter. This would have been a war.
     
  5. Fedor Em

    Fedor Em Enforcement, VRWC style Full Member

    4,452
    4
    Dec 5, 2006
    Pressure fighters with not so great defense like Pryor get whooped by Duran. Roberto wins this off better inside fighting, and superior defense. 10-5 or something like that at 140. Pryor was a beast but Duran would have beaten him. The only pressure fighter I would give a chance at beating Duran at 140 would be Armstrong. It takes an extremely slick fighter ala Whitaker, or Benitez to be Duran at these weights.
     
  6. brownpimp88

    brownpimp88 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,378
    10
    Feb 26, 2007
    Pryor is overrated in mythical matchups, but so is duran. Alexis arguello started at featherweight, but he was clearly way too big for that weightclass, so he eventually grew out of it. By the way, pryor is a natural lightweight and he's one of those fighters that wouldnt be intimidated by duran. I would give pryor a 50/50 shot at beating him head to head.
     
  7. Mankind

    Mankind Super Moderator banned

    1,417
    2
    Jul 19, 2004

    great point about the fact Pryor was a natural lightweight.

    Pryor brought more fireworks and thunder than guys like esteban Dejesus......a fight at 135 between these two....WOW!
     
  8. George W Hedge

    George W Hedge Member Full Member

    238
    7
    Jul 28, 2004
    Duran beats pryor on pts

    Why ?

    He has got a better defence, better variety of punches & probably hits harder & is no less tough.

    Too many tools but pryor lasts the distance, he was also as tough as nails.

    :good
     
  9. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,730
    44,267
    Apr 27, 2005
    Duran's pressure and Pryor's leaky defense leads to a Duran stoppage. Duran is the sort of fighter who can and will make Aaron pay for his fundamental errors. Guys like Duran and SRL are nightmare for Pryor, really. Duran would possibly be the worst guy at 140 i could ever think of for Pryor. Chavez would be tough but Duran would be impossible.
     
  10. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    267
    Jul 22, 2004
    This would be a close call. Its going the full 15 in a true backburner. Duran had the defense, timing, skill while Pryor had the better speed. Both had great stamina and workrate. I think Duran edges it out 9-6
     
  11. Holmes' Jab

    Holmes' Jab Master Jabber Full Member

    5,112
    74
    Nov 20, 2006
    Duran outworks "The Hawk", to take a clear UD.
     
  12. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    Yes it would have. It would have been a fight for the ages.

    I pick Duran, but counting Pryor out is not very smart, he's a live one.
     
  13. Executioner

    Executioner Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,587
    8
    Apr 22, 2006
    Duran, he's simply the better all around fighter
     
  14. Sweet Science

    Sweet Science Peaceful Muslim Warrior Full Member

    1,116
    8
    Jun 20, 2007
    I rate Duran as the greatest Lightweight ever. But I would have to go with Pryor on this one. Too much non stop pressure and plenty of speed would begin to get unsettling for Duran as the fight wore on. Both fighters were crazy, and the unrelenting pace of a constant all out war would suit Pryor's manic style & workrate a little better.
     
  15. Duodenum

    Duodenum Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,604
    290
    Apr 18, 2007
    At their peaks, both seemed impervious, upstairs, downstairs, in resistance to sustaining facial damage, and in terms of endurance.

    Where the Hawk and El Cholo differ is in defense, bodypunching, center of gravity, and countering skill. Roberto would be under and inside Aaron's attack with his quicker and shorter punches. Duran could also come over the top every well, against a frequently upright adversary.
    Pryor can pitch over a hundred punches per round for the full 15, but with his high chin, wide open body, and headhunting fixation, this would come down to hitting without being hit, and counterpunching, as well as balance.

    Pryor was not in the habit of shooting for a stoppage win, frequently a make or break proposition. In contrast, Duran was capable of deciding to aim for a scorecard win early enough to carry it off. He had the great Ken Buchanan beat on the scorecards as round 13 ended, secured the decision early in Montreal, and outpointed several fine opponents in nontitle affairs.

    It would be exciting to watch, but a clear cut UD for Duran when over. He could well boost his points margin by catching Hawk for a couple of flash KD's as well.

    The Hawk could use his legs for elusive movement very well when he wished to, and that would be his best opportunity to gain the favor of the judging, but with his characteristic approach, I doubt he would consider that strategy against a foe of Duran's makeup.