~~~ABCDEs - Ranking puzzle...~~~

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Decebal, Sep 25, 2007.


  1. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    1) How would you rank fighters A, B, C, D and E if:

    A could beat B, D and E but not C
    B could beat C and D, but not A or E
    C could beat A and E, but not B or D
    D could beat C and E, but not A or B
    E could beat B, but not A or C or D?


    2) should fighters be ranked according to the names they have beaten on their resume in the past or just according to their likely present form, based on showings in recent fights and effects of recent fights on their likely present state?
     
  2. ron u.k.

    ron u.k. Boxing Addict banned

    4,920
    12
    Feb 14, 2006
    obviously these musst be alphabet titles?
     
  3. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    :lol: :good

    (serious question!)
     
  4. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    tobkhan, mate, you'd better get used to thinking for yourself ALONE from now on and not even RELYING on a hint from any other ranking list out there - you're on the :happy :happy :happy ESB Rankings Committee:happy :happy :happy !:good
     
  5. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    I've added another crucial question...would love to see your answer.:good
     
  6. China_hand_Joe

    China_hand_Joe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,217
    12
    Sep 21, 2006
    This is an example of how American's rate fighters...

    There are 3 fighters...A B and C.

    A beat B and lost to C twice.

    B lost to A and drew with C.

    C beat A twice and drew with B

    So...

    A - 1-0-2
    B - 2-1-0
    C - 0-1-1

    Americans rate A (Hopkins) the highest by far.
     
  7. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    Please give me YOUR answers to my questions. Thank you!:good
     
  8. China_hand_Joe

    China_hand_Joe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,217
    12
    Sep 21, 2006
    A
    C
    B
    D
    E

    Going purely on the wins and losses.



    And always rate fighters on recent form - making concessions for injuries etc. How much ability they have at the present time.
     
  9. ChuckYoungblood

    ChuckYoungblood Active Member Full Member

    522
    0
    Jun 28, 2007
    It will never be like a math exercise to rate fighters. Maybe C's win was very convincing and A fought B 6 years ago and still living off that win? I think this discussion is worthless without naming the fighters...
     
  10. DanePugilist

    DanePugilist God vs God - Death Angel Full Member

    6,837
    2
    Oct 14, 2006
    Another one on the same topic?
     
  11. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    Given the info you are given, you should have some clue as to the right order...of course, the more info you were given, the more valid your answer.
     
  12. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    Yes, but harder...think carefully!:good
     
  13. DanePugilist

    DanePugilist God vs God - Death Angel Full Member

    6,837
    2
    Oct 14, 2006
    1. A
    2. B
    3. D.
    4. C.
    5. E.

    2. Present state holds most value, but past shouldn't be disregarded.
     
  14. China_hand_Joe

    China_hand_Joe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,217
    12
    Sep 21, 2006
    C should be second for beating the excellent A.
     
  15. DanePugilist

    DanePugilist God vs God - Death Angel Full Member

    6,837
    2
    Oct 14, 2006
    Yeah, he could be, but then he just screwed up...