How about this for a legend? A) Calzaghe B) Kessler D) Inkin C) Bute E) Mundine. Or is it: A) Kessler B) Calzaghe D) Inkin C) Bute E) Mundine.?? Hang on! Bute cannot be C, even though he would have a higher chance against Calzaghe than against Kessler! Dow! All my hard work - in vain!
As the ratings commitee, I would've ranked whoever paid me the most first at the top of my rankings. A,B,C,D,E could've beaten F, but hey, guess who my number one contender is? Or am I just too cynical?
SMW is impossible for your thesis. As it is, none of the others are even remotely a threat to the 2 top dogs. 1) Kessler(Will not lose to anyone). 2) JC(Will lose to Kessler, and maybe Mundine in the future). 3) Mundine.(Might lose to Inkin. Might make a threat to JC). 4) Bute. (Might beat Inkin, but will lose to the 3 above.) 5) Inkin. (life and death fight with Bute, which he will lose, and he might even pull an upset against Mundine). But who knows:yep
You're explanation works for you. Yet you introduced a variable (Whomever's law) and didn't let anyone else know it was in play.
I am not sure what you mean, mate! Anyway, if someone can provide a more sensible, reasoned solution to the problem I set out, I will be pleased to see it! Let's have it!
I think Mundine is over the hill, whereas Bute is up and coming. Also, I take everything YOU say VERY seriously!:bart This content is protected
He means that reality is more complicated than a mathematical thesis such as yours. As I have stated, alot of parameters come into play other than who beats who.
Of course! Obviously!:good It's funny, people get on my back for not making it complicated enough, after complaining it was too complicated in the first place!:yep