C's win over A is greater than D's win over C. They both share a victory over E. Thus C is clearly ranked over D. Not that hard to figure out in my opinion.
I'm sorry but mathematically analyzing data must not be your strong point. You are saying that a win over number 4 and 5 is better than a win over number 1 and 5. Do you realize this?
You are jumping the gun. By his calculations, your #4 is his #2. You would need to have already figured out and agreed on your math to make your statement. As I said, there are a ton of variables.
I never said we were provided with anything more than Head to head. I am saying how much VALUE you place on one fighter beating another when doing your rankings seems to be different than his.
He is stating D should be rated above C. What that means is that in his ratings C is rated 4 and E is rated 5. Thus, they both share a win over #5 while D has a second win over his #4 and C has a win over his #1. Not jumping the gun at all. I don't understand the confusion. edited to put the correct letter in.