ABCs to discuss creation of 'super heavyweight' division

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by ishy, Jan 15, 2010.


  1. smjm089

    smjm089 Active Member Full Member

    512
    0
    Jun 7, 2009
    These ABC organizations will never stop till they ruin the sport completley its utter disgraceful that these corrupt money grabbing scumbags are more or less bringing the sport to its knees surely the creation of a superheavyweight division would be the last straw for them as quite a few of the top fighters now i think are seeing through them and the sanction fees.
     
  2. UndisputedUK

    UndisputedUK Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,152
    1
    Feb 20, 2006
    I thought this was be the reason for the increase in the Cruiserweight division to 200lbs. The small heavyweights like Hide, Haye etc could fit in in that divison. Creating a new divison would probably mean that the Klitschko's could dominate both.

    People are generally getting bigger and taller. Would it not be better to increase every weight class by a certain %. So that featherweight would be like 128lbs, welterweight 150lbs, Super middleweight 174lbs, Cruiserweight 215lbs. Just an idea.

    What we don't need is like 30 weight divisons and multiple champions.
     
  3. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    42
    Jan 7, 2005
    If they HAVE to alter something I hope its not the current divisions. Theres a massive heritage and tradition there and being able to compare Ray Robinson to Jose Napoles to Ray Leonard to Don Curry because they all fought at 147lbs isn't something I'd like to give up for future generations.
     
  4. ishy

    ishy Loyal Member Full Member

    44,755
    7
    Mar 9, 2008
    Exactly my thougts :good
     
  5. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    Speaking of alphabets, the IBO really think they have arrived..... not ranking the other org's champs anymore!
     
  6. UndisputedUK

    UndisputedUK Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,152
    1
    Feb 20, 2006
    I love that avatar. Labour out! :lol:

    We cannot do another 5 years of those muppets!:patsch

    I would happily pay more tax if it meant overiding and reversing 15 years of New Labour's social policies. Communism for all, apart from the really rich and MP's! We have been well and truly mugged over in terms of Education, Law and Order, Immigration, Services and Rights over the 90's to 00's. :patsch
    What's more the fool doesn't know when to quit, all the more sweet when they are booted out.:good
     
  7. mrbassie

    mrbassie Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,206
    16
    Oct 18, 2004
    If this happens then boxing is officially doomed. I don't get how these greedy *******s brains work. Go on any boxing forum and poll the fans and overwhelmingly they will vote that the number of weight classes should be reduced.
     
  8. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,070
    29
    Jul 21, 2004
    **** THIS!

    They just want to create more belts and earn money.

    We desperately need a governing body and one belt. An org that cares for the sport not their bank balance.

    Why would we need a super heavyweight division when Chagaev and Haye beat Valuev. Byrd was tough enough to get the win over Vitali. Brewster, Purrity and Sanders are between 6'2 and 6'4 and put Wlad away. Lewis lost to two 6'2 men.

    The fact is medium sized heavies are beating super heavies... and it is not about weight because all those guys are fat and overmuscled.

    Haye was 217 when he beat Valuev. This is all just BS which will kill our sport.
     
  9. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,070
    29
    Jul 21, 2004
    This is a terrible idea.

    People getting bigger just means they should be in a different weight class.

    Truth is when guys are cruisers and upwards, they can all crack. Ali got put to bed by 185 pounders and his chin was tested by the best hitters ever.
     
  10. kieron

    kieron Active Member Full Member

    1,098
    1
    Oct 30, 2008
    This is utter shite and is definately a bad move. They already kind of did it by creating the cruiserweight division for those not quite big enough to compete. The problem is that too many "heavyweights" use it as an excuse to eat fried chicken and cup cakes as their preparation for a fight. If they need to **** about with the marquee division then just impose a max weight limit of say 245lbs. Anyone above this weight shouldn't be in a ring anyway (including Valuev).
     
  11. Boro chris

    Boro chris Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,275
    21
    Mar 14, 2005
    Do they WANT people to stop watching boxing?:huh
     
  12. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,179
    Oct 22, 2006
    What does it matter? If (for example) a 220lbs David Haye was offered the right deal to fight a 250lbs Vitali; do really think that there is a Super Heavyweight division, for fighters over 240lbs, that, that will stop the fight happening? Of course not!

    The Evidence is that as long as weigh 210lbs+, it does not matter how much heavier your opponent is, it is a fair fight.
     
  13. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,818
    51,883
    Mar 21, 2007
    Yeah, i have a very, very bad feeling. Four more HW champs. Just what the sport needs. It's like these ****ers are looking through the wrong end of the binoculars.
     
  14. Dan684

    Dan684 Dave's Stepdad Full Member

    17,612
    3
    Feb 19, 2009
    Audley(wg2) will be rubbing his hands with great anticipation :deal