Abel calls canelo a liar "He never was gonna fight us"

Wound up? Why would any get wound up dealing with idiots? :shock:

Funny thing is, you call yourself a true boxing fan...but you change your stance when it suits you. You've said before that titles should be defended at the limit. But because you hate 3G (Over inconstent sh*t), you allow your beliefs to be compromised.

Do you hate Ward now? After all, he isn't facing HW's by now as Hunter said he would.


Do you hate Rigondeaux now, since he said no to Loma at 126, but was OK with Frampton?

No...of course yo don't. That would require consistency from you, which you've demonstrated you don't have. :thumbsup

 

Yeah the fact that they slated Canelo v Khan so much makes this decision a strange one?
There is a difference though between the two fights for anyone bothered,Canelo actively sought out Khan whereas Golovkin was ducked by Canelo and those in his own division,after Eubank broke down Brook was made?

 

This doesn't matter to the forum idiots. These message board rubes only go by sound bites or tweets to get their info. Research isn't something many here like to do. :-(

 

TY for the confirmation. I knew he was that guy telling his middleweight to fight domestic welterweights. Such a big mouth for a guy like him, he should stfu and look for a decent opponent for his fighter for once in his fkng life.

 

When did rigo call frampton out at 126? as far as I know he called him out again (he has done it 2098347503429 times in the last few years) a couple of weeks ago, but he said nothing about the weight, I supposed he was talking about superbantam, actually.

 

I'm aware that there are a and b sides and in this equation canelo is a and ggg is b. Canelo has paid his dues and has earned the right to call the shots and dictate terms. That's the way it has always been. Ggg said 168-154 can get it. So why not fight the cash cow on his terms like everyone else does? Does he think he's better than everyone who came before him? Canelo fought pbf on his terms did the same with cotto. Did he like it no but he did what he had to do to make the fight. Ggg for whatever reason doesn't do whatever it takes to make big fights.

 

He included 154 because Floid was there champ there...do you really need every dot connected for you and explained why? Just STFU about catchweights from now on since you no longer think title fights should be at the limit. Pathetic sellout...

 

Triple joke could fight chocolatito in his next fight and you would still continue riding his d*ck

 

:rofl

 

I've seen an in ring (post fight) interview where Sanchez said they would go down to 154lbs (Absolutely) for Floyd but would NOT do 155lbs for Canelo. I never understood that besides him flexing or thinking he could flex against GoldenBoy. Fable Sanchez spews nothing but sh*t 90% of the time.

 

It's a good thing only brain dead message boarders would think that a realistic possibility. :good

 

It's not hard to grasp....3G would go to 154 to face the champ there, who was Floid at the time. Alvarez fights at MW....so...if you still need this explained....ask someone else. This has been done to death...and if some don't understand...well...there's always WWE.

(My apologies for the salty reply....)

 

I don't understand this sentence myself. Team GGG did flex against Canelo and they forced the "A-side" to drop his belt.

 

We already know this

 

As this thread suggests...MOST of us already knew this. :hey