Abel Sanchez: Charlo is nothing to me

If Charlo doesn't deserve a shot , then Golovkin didn't deserve a title shot against Sturm , therefore nobody ever ducked Golovkin.

 

The Problem is that Charlo hasn't done anything @MW yet Heiland was only medicore and Centeno Jr isn't a top 10 MW either. All Charlo has to do is to beat 1 or 2 top 10 guys at MW and the fight will happen
Don't get me wrong Charlo looks like next big thing but guys like Jacobs, the Saunders vs Murray winner, Murata and IBF mandatory Derevyanchenko are more deserving the Golovkin fight at the moment.
I don't think the GGG vs Charlo fight will happen this year

 

Wrong again WBA regular Champ Golovkin waited 2 years for a possible Sturm fight until Superchamp Sturm fought Geale instead and lost. Charlo is only a MW since 9 month

 

Charlo is fighting the guy Sulecki schooled. Dude has to pick up the pace if he wants the fight in a year.

Looks like Derevyanchenko - Andrade may be getting made. Jacobs is fighting Sulecki, who is actually lower top 10 caliber at 160. Other guys are higher priority targets with better cases for having earned a Canelo/GGG fight, and ducking has nothing to do with it.

There's nothing anyone can do to leapfrog BJS in line, to boot.

 

Who did Mugabi beat at MW to deserve a shot at Hagler? Nobody is the answer.

Charlo is a name and an attraction so it makes for a good fight. GGG was a nobody and brought nothing to the table against Sturm therefor he had no need to take the risk for no reward at the time.
If Charlo doesn't deserve it then GGG didn't deserve it either.

 

I think the winner of the Canelo vs GGG II winner could drop the WBC belt.

 

Maybe if Canelo wins but Golovkins goal is to unify all the belts. It would suprise me if he drops a belt.

 

I would also be surprised if GGG vacates, but i feel he is currently at a point in his career where he is only interested in making the big money fights, but hopefully neither Canelo or Golovkin vacate.

 

There seems to be some bad blood as the WBC considers Canelo a bit of a traitor. As such, I could see Canelo dropping it straight away and telling them where to stuff their bill.

GGG is dead set on unification, so if he wins, it'll be BJS next and they'll get an exemption from the WBC to let it happen for all the titles. If- and it's an if at this point- GGG wins that, it's anybody's guess if he maintains the belts or drops a couple.

 

It was bull**** for guys to duck Golovkin when he was on the way up and it's bull**** if Golovkin starts to play the same game. I'll be terribly disappointed of one of my favourite boxers started doing the same ****. I'd excuse postponing a mando for, say, a unification, though.

 

Charlo needs to earn his shot at 160.

His only stand out victory is Trout who arguably beat him and was dealt with far easier by Canelo, Lara and Hurd.

 

Ummm. If Eubank is top dog at 168 I have to admit that I would like to see him vs GGG finally. So long as Charlo is OK with getting step aside cash (and it would probably be quite a lot) then I'm OK with it too. What I'm not OK with is if Charlo demanded the mando over a step-aside payout and GGG dropped the belt in response, which is a clear duck. Or if the WBC or whoever invented a "Super Platinum Supreme Belt" for GGG and forced Charlo to fight some other bum instead.

 

You could have just posted the interview.