Abel Sanchez says NO to fights vs Andrade/Charlo/Callum Smith but YES to Rob Brant !

CJ i've tried to give you an opportunity to explain yourself and I've gone out of my way to attempt to see things from your perspective, but you have refused to explain your comment about how Canelo didn't beat GGG fair and square like a MAN.

You can't deny that Canelo fought the 2nd fight how many complained he didn't fight the first fight. It proves that no matter how Canelo fought even when he fought Mexican Style you will still make excuses and find ways to discredit his performance and what he accomplished.

Canelo is just a flat out better fighter than GGG. It's been proven over 24 rounds and if you can't see that I don't know what else to tell you.

 

Gp to a boxing gym talk to the trainers
watch them learn from them. Learn the sport its the only way

 

Many trainers had Canelo winning the rematch. You tell me to listen to trainers but they are saying Canelo won. Maybe you should start practicing what you preach.

 

I was going to mention that, I know several trainers that coached me and also coached plenty of decent pros that had Canelo winning the second fight. It’s really a matter of preference at this point. I personally had Nelo winning 7/5.

I probably shouldn’t have interjected, but I did....I honestly take “press row” opinions with a grain of salt.

 

Every post on here is someones personal opinion at least I know mine are. Sad part is thays all they will ever be. The State Commissions gave carte blanche to do whatever they want without fear of retribution as we have seen s many times lately

 

Problem is bad judging is and can be subjective just like fans. If the verdict after the end of 12 rounds somehow validates your inherent biases you’ll naturally label it “good” and “fair” if it swings the the other way in a close fight it’s a robbery. I just can’t seem to wrap my mitts around the lack of stratification from fans, obtaining a loss on your record can have a very layered and logical story behind it. The triple GGG loss happened you might not agree with it but it’s been etched in stone. That’s just the sum of the fights unique parts being added together, assessed and judged by three individuals. It certainly does not wash away ggg production, heart and excellent performance.

 

Ha Ha ha you can see that shadow-of -a real-man has been champing @ the bit to get back & post....As usual total trolling ...poor kid.

 

After seeing FLOYD/PAC, WARD/ KOVALEV 1&2&GGG/ CANELO1&2
can you say in all honesty their was no corruption involved ? I seriously doubt it

 

Corruption is in the eye of the beholder when you don’t have concrete evidence. It exists for sure however I can’t confidently say I saw it in any of the fights you mentioned. I had Floyd winning based on PACs inefficiency, Ward/Kov I could have gone to kov no arguments and I had GGG winning the first fight and Canelo edging the second.

 

Golovkin is simply a better fighter than Canelo. He proved that he could fight as well off the front foot or the back foot.Not only is he a better boxer but his intangibles are better too. He's got a better chin and a better gas tank. The second fight he was staggering Canelo late in the fight.

Moreover, Golovkin isn't a drug cheat and doesn't make use of loaded judges

 

This content is protected

 

Nice home video Shadow111. That actually explains a lot about you and your opinions.

 

It was for you, you're the one in the twilight zone not me.

 

Hey, you're the one with the videos of what its like there. See if you can't find Oscar's soup ladle while your at it.

 

There is a fifth dimension, beyond that which is known to man. It is a dimension as vast as space and as timeless as infinity. It is the middle ground between light and shadow, between science and superstition.

And it lies between the pit of man's fears and the summit of his knowledge. This is the dimension of imagination. It is an area which we call the Twilight Zone.

As you can see, you're in the Twilight Zone.