Abel Sanchez says NO to fights vs Andrade/Charlo/Callum Smith but YES to Rob Brant !

Golovkin let Teasle take his finger prints, he didn't resist like Canelo did. Let it go CJ , let it go.

 

Can you please answer the question? You stated that Canelo didn't fight like a MAN? How can you fight more like a man than how Canelo fought in the rematch? If you had a problem with how he fought the first fight because he didn't go toe to toe with GGG, then how can you complain about how Canelo fought the rematch?

If that isn't fighting like a Man then what is? He fought how GGG wanted him to fight didn't he? He fought how the fans complained that he didn't fight in the first fight. He came right at GGG, he fought him in the pocket all night, coming forward with relentless aggression. How is that not fighting like a MAN? He fought like a warrior in the rematch. How can you complain about how Canelo fought the rematch? He did exactly what he was criticized for not doing in the first fight in the rematch, but you're still saying he didn't fight like a Man?

 

Great...the kid who thinks being a noob in sports or not is based on message board post count and likes is back with more of his crap no one reads....

 

You're just salty after getting schooled the other day.

 

It doesn't matter. He could be 1-0, and GGG's manager comes right out and says GGG will not take the fight. Golovkin had the option of Deveryanchenko, Murata, Andrade or Charlo when the Canelo 2 was cancelled, he chose whatzizname. That's not my opinion, that's historical record.

Golovkin was 19-0 when he got his first title fight against Milton Nunez; he had beaten NO ONE and he didn't have a JRMDLWT tittle to his credit.

 

Salty? What did you school me on, aside from thinking being a noob is based on POST COUNT?!?!

You're such a friggin noob you don't even know what constitutes being a noob...

 

I cannot support corruption in the sport Ive spent most of my life in

 

The longer you've been doing something, the more experience you have discussing boxing, the more you show that, the less of a noob you are. I can't believe you're still fighting this lol.

There is no way to really quantify who has more boxing knowledge which is what you say being a noob is all about. The stats go a long way in showing who isn't a noob. Now I don't know if I should be offended by being called a noob especially by you but to call someone a noob who's been here longer than you is pretty funny.

You even stated that you were here since 2003 under a different name right so obviously being here longer than 2 years and "post count" means something.

 

Me either. But what you call corruption is different than what others call corruption. Anyone can call it corruption when someone who you wanted to win lost or who you didn't think won wins.

 

Don't twist my words I didnt say he didn't fight like a mqn He fought like
an idiot ruhing in punching air LOL
He fought o the best of his ability bU LOST GGG boxed his horns off

 

Look idiot...being a noob has NOTHING to do with a message board or posts. HOW are you this dense and air-headed at the same time?!? Noob is short for newbie, which means NEW to the sport.

Post count? what a buffoon...

 

Absolute BS As always I want to see the better man win a legitimate fair fight. hat did not happen
Voxing is so corrupt these days it rarely happens

 

LOL I ain't twisted anything. You said :

So how did he not beat GGG fair and square Like a MAN? How did he stole GGG's titles. He took the fight to him he walked him down walked right through him made GGG retreat. How is that not fighting like a MAN. Please explain YOUR comment.

 

NEW to the sport? And how can you possibly be new to the sport when you've been on this website talking boxing for over 6 years?

 

Ypu Moonelo addiucts are just maring even bigger fools of yourselves 85 % of the boxing people & public thought GGG CLEARLY QON BOTH FIGHTS!!
That's almost 9 /10 !!!! lolAre we all wrong & you 4 or 5 trolls are right ????
Not one of you has ever been inside a boxing gym I'd bet lol