abit of realism? bradleys calf changed it?

And just prior to Tim's quick decline...

http://cdn.fansided.com/gif/PaqBrad2.gif
http://gfycat.com/IdioticPleasingAoudad

 

Bob Arums weak stable of viable opponents means its most likely to happen unfortunately

Dam u cold warm :bbb

 

I thought Lampley was high when he was talking about the appeal of a third fight but a fifth fight with Marquez could obviously be considered redundant as well.

 

Finally, somebody admits what everybody else knows but doesn't want to say. bradley had pac's number and was on the way to controlling the fight and winning a convincing decision until the injury happened. When pac complained of a leg cramp all of his nuttlikcers complained about it. bradley was beating that a** good.

 

He had a sore toe.

 

It was an ankle injury in the first because of no socks and now it's his calves? Damn

 

Pac also got leg cramps in this fight.

http://ringtv.craveonline.com/news/332945-manny-pacquiao-satisfied-with-toe-to-toe-victory-over-tim-bradley

Is the fight even now?

Seriously though. As soon as Pac was announced the winner, Bradley clapped his hands to accept Pac as the winner. Bradley clearly thinks he lose fair and square but some fans thinks otherwise and I don't understand it.

 

97% of boxing fans thought Pac won the fight.

So, Bradley only gets injuries whenever he fights Pac?

 

Just because a guy is a good sportsman doesn't mean he thinks he lost. Accepting the judges decision doesn't mean you agree with it. Not everybody who gets in the ring has to act like an a-hole when the decision goes against them. It's called having class and being a good sport. You should try it sometime.

 

bradley is to muscular to me. i can see him pulling muscles and ligaments in his legs doing all that ducking and dogging he was doing to make pacman miss
oh yeah i can see that happening over and over with him.

 

They're gonna say you're wrong because it takes away from what they want to believe was a dominant performance by pac in avenging the "robbery" of the first fight. The reality is, you are absolutely correct. And anybody who is fair-minded will admit that. But to get people to admit to that on this forum is not gonna happen. First of all, a lotta these guys on here are, frankly speaking, idiots. Secondly, they have their own reasons for not wanting to admit it.

 

"I don't want to make excuses"
5 seconds later
"I lost only because the calf... the socks... something something."

Or is Bradley glass legged?

 

Bradley's calf injury changed him, not the fight. Bradley's wild movements in the ring are what contributed to it, though he does have good footwork. My personal opinion is Bradley tried way too hard to get the KO, I know their thinking, based on the outcome of the first fight was, they needed the KO, but after watching the first half of the fight I'm not so sure that was the case, he did well in the first half of the fight, but obviously exhausted himself trying to stop Pacquiao.