About Pac: Am I the first one to point out that...

I pointed it out on someone else's thread where they mentioned how he looked to be declining. I agree he lacked the feints and combo punches to the stomach than to the head. As well as the bouncing in and out and wasn't able to pull the trigger in time. He was flat footed for large parts in the fight. He looked pretty poor imo, though he still did enough to win the fight clearly.

 

Thank you. His decline is being exaggerated.

 

not at all. against Oscar he was hardly flat footed and was darting in and out constantly. In distance, landing, bouncing away out of range.

 

i am tempted to think exactly the same thing:think

 

This is so obvious but not surprised that *******s can't see this.

Put Pac in with a washed up or stationary fighter and you'll see how
quickly he reverts to Pacmonster of old.

 

An over the hill Pacquiao still give a young hungry Bradley hell.

 

They admitted this strategy FFS, and the 'tards are discounting it

 

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JR3k7Fog_5c"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JR3k7Fog_5[/ame]
This version of Pacquiao would have annihilated Bradly.

 

How did fight like he did against Oscar? atsch Those two fights are nothing alike. Oscar was a completely different fight, Oscar was pressing the action most of the fight, Pacquiao was using a ton of lateral / in and out movement / feints , 3-4-5-6-7 punch combinations. Not even in the same ballpark.

 

this version of pac would give floyd fits

 

This version of Pac never gets tired(great stamina), you never see him take a break, In the Margarito fight, Pac takes a break..

 

:thumbsup finally someone sees the light. *****s cant accept floyd is going downhill. cotto tagged him silly when no other fighter has come close. they still dont think pac would do better than cotto atsch

 

Maybe I'm wrong but I think the biggest difference is his heart is not in it is much. Obviously he isn't the same fighter but I think a lot of the difference is mental.