Abraham/Dirrell & Adamek/Dawson

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Lampley, Mar 28, 2010.


  1. Lampley

    Lampley Boxing Junkie banned

    7,508
    2
    Oct 30, 2005
    Anyone who thinks Dirrell needed to look for a way out, or that he would have necessarily gotten KOd last night, needs to revisit Adamek/Dawson.

    Chad was winning in a somewhat similar fashion (albeit even more easily) and then takes a HUGE right in the 10th round and goes down. He makes it up and is badly hurt, but he hangs on.

    He then comes back in the 11th and 12th with renewed focus and wins the bout without any additional trouble.

    Dawson was in far worse shape than Dirrell and is known to have stamina problems, whereas Dirrell's best moments against Froch happened late.

    We'll never know what would have happened in the final 4.5 minutes last night, but Abraham was probably right to feel desperate and likely staring at a clean, uncontroversial defeat.

    Guess he couldn't handle that prospect, so unfortunately he sullied his reputation by hitting a downed opponent. Too bad.
     
  2. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,340
    9,955
    Jun 23, 2008
    Dawson has more balls & talent then Dirrell.
     
  3. Bobby Heenan

    Bobby Heenan Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,248
    0
    Oct 30, 2008
    i like them both....but i dunno about that
     
  4. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,340
    9,955
    Jun 23, 2008
    How dont you know about that? Dawson is head and shoulders a better fighter then Dirrell.
     
  5. Lampley

    Lampley Boxing Junkie banned

    7,508
    2
    Oct 30, 2005

    I agree except for stamina and power, but those are pretty significant factors.

    But Dawson definitely is a better defender, more intelligent boxer (at least as of Johnson II) and more technically complete.

    Dirrell is very good as well, though.
     
  6. Cpt_Vodka

    Cpt_Vodka Teddy Atlas Full Member

    828
    0
    Feb 7, 2010
    For starters Dawson > Dirrell in pretty much every aspect category. Dawson would also never lose to a guy like Froch.

    Also, Dawson was not "badly hurt" / "in far worse shape" lol, you need to rewatch that fight again sir. He got stunned and got dropped. It's not like his legs were gone or anything, he just maintained his composure and got back into the mix in that same minute. Lost that round for sure, round 11 was pretty much even but most gave it to Adamek due to sympathy, and round 12 was pretty equal as well but Dawson had the edge.
     
  7. Lampley

    Lampley Boxing Junkie banned

    7,508
    2
    Oct 30, 2005
    See my post above about Dawson vs. Dirrell. Dawson's stamina issues are well-established at this point, and Dirrell has to be considered a harder puncher.

    Dawson indeed was badly hurt. I didn't say he was out on his feet, but he clearly was dazed and forced to hold on. For the first time, he wasn't able to use his feet to dominate the fight.

    He was certainly more hurt than Dirrell was after he was dropped, yet he managed to hang on and win without controversy.