Another one, the same day as Keleş vs. Garrido II, was Orlando Fiordigigloio vs. Zakaria Attou. There's no way Orlando lost that match. My scorecard which was almost generous to Attou. Round 1 Attou 10-9 Round 2 Attou 10-9 Closer Round 3 Fiordigiglio 10-9 Close Round 4 Fiordigiglio 10-8 Round 5 Attou 10-9 Round 6 Fiordigiglio 10-9 Close Round 7 Fiordigiglio 10-9 Close Round 8 Attou 10-9 Close Round 9 Fiordigiglio 10-9 Close Round 10 Fiordigiglio 10-9 Round 11 Attou 10-9 Close Round 12 Fiordigiglio 10-9 115-112 Fiordigiglio 116-111 or 117-110 are fine as well. Drinquor's scorecard. Round 1: 10-9 Attou Round 2: 10-9 Fiordigiglio Round 3: 10-9 Attou Round 4: 10-8 Fiordigiglio Round 5: 10-9 Fiordigiglio Round 6: 10-9 Attou Round 7: 10-9 Fiordigiglio Round 8: 10-9 Attou Round 9: 10-9 Fiordigiglio Round 10: 10-9 Fiordigiglio Round 11: 10-9 Fiordigiglio Round 12: 10-9 Fiordigiglio 116-111 Fiordigiglio Official scorecards. 116-111 Attou 111-117 Fiordigiglio 115-112 Attou SD for Attou This content is protected
How many scouts are looking for White American talent? Al Haymon has the only large stable of cultural and racially mixed talent in boxing. Thats why I cheer for guys like Smith Jr. who broke through the cracks. Just look at the masturbation of foreign fighters by guys on this forum and tell me if anyone of you would financially support Intentional Butt the fighter? Guys like you and fat Dan Rafael can't do a ****ing sit up to save your mothers life and you question a guys career in a sport you sit around and type about all day? Eat a bag of dicks sissy. This ain't my fight but I made it my fight.
Just because he didn't perform up to your standard of what you think a dominant performance should look like to allow someone to win away from home, doesn't necessarily mean he didn't do enough to legitimately win it. I don't score matches based on what the hometown judges need to not rob a guy, I judge the rounds based on who I think won them, and Cacace won it. It was a tactical match with neither man pushing the pace, but Cacace controlled the range and dictated whatever pace that was set. He was robbed.
What? I asked a question.i box myself despite your great attempt at deducing my physical state through one sentence I wrote. I asked him a question.He stopped the RBRs to follow his dream of being a pro boxer.I was interested to know what's happened since. As for talking about Haymon.WTF you on about?
You have the opening post on a forum trying to incite a debate on the worst judging this year and then immediately OP tells no one else to join in the discussion unless they rake up obscure fights. Some guy asks a simple question about what's happening with IB's pro ambitions. Next man comes and acts like his mum has been called out. Then I get accused of being a Pac nuthugger. I'm sitting in an airport Starbucks just cringing, some of you guys take this forum too seriously, it's not that deep.
You don't have to "rake up obscure fights". I provided video of my two candidates in the OP. Anyone can feel free to watch them to see if they disagree with me on those being the worst decisions of the year, it isn't like these aired clandestinely once on some secret stream and are not viewable since. Both fights happen to have been for titles, albeit relatively minor ones compared with the world championship, sanctioned by a major org (both were for WBO Euro belts), so they weren't even THAT obscure. I'm not talking about rando Argentine 4-rounders here. If somebody wants to put forth a serious alternative with a persuasive argument for why their selection or remotely notable (and yes I think a couple of WBO Euro title bouts ought to make the grade of notability standards, which is no sillier than some drawing the line at "HBO/Showtime or bust!") was as bad as mine or worse, like @CST80 , then I'm receptive to it. What I will not brook is any of the expected nonsense from the lowest-common-denominator rabble that make up most of the forum. You know damn well that had I not headed them off at the pass a majority of folks, let's say at least 18 of the first thirty replies (that is two whole pages) would have parroted "Horn vs. Pac!!! " ...which is an opinion that should not be taken seriously or given an environment to spread or thrive.
I don't think anyone would have mentioned Pcquiao/Horn apart from the obvious trolls. And who cares because the obvious trolls ruin almost every thread like Wilder threads for instance which are swamped with Dustin Nicholls etc. **** happens. Anyway, for me robbery of the year is probably Benn v Peynaud given that it was mathematically impossible for any sane scorer to have given the card that the ref produced for Benn. Would have been a good scalp for Peynaud and potentially robbed him of a decent wage for a rematch so the robbery was substantial even for a six-rounder.
Speaking of @CST80 , even most of his submissions are trash (sorry dude!) When you consider how many of his final scores are in the 115-113 and 116-112 range. The guys he thinks won need to have DOMINATED the seven or eight rounds they won in those in order to put those on the same pedestal as, say, Keleş vs. Garrido II in terms of robberies. Everyone that watched the latter agreed that Garrido shut out Keleş (else came one round shy), and these weren't close rounds that he just barely shaded. He cleaned the dude's clock, all night long. You need a VERY strong candidate to bump that off the list. Granted a lot of CST's mentions I haven't seen yet myself. I'll leave the door open to any of them perhaps indeed being more egregious scoring travesties, but in the meantime I remain skeptical especially in light of his own personal very close final scorecards in many of them.
See this is a fair dinkum argument to make, and far more reasonable a shout than Horn vs. Pac or any other situation where someone's favorite lost a close fight. Problem is, that doesn't sound more convincing than "Garrido shut out and beat up Keleş for ten rounds according to literally everyone that watched (except a small handful of people on Twitter, all Turks, all clearly rooting with nationalistic bias and wearing rose colored glasses) but still had judgment go against him". Was the situation parallel? Would you say Benn was shut out and beaten up in every single round? Again, in the spirit of debate I am happy to give Benn vs. Peynaud a viewing at your suggestion when I get a chance. I would just ask the same courtesy that you watch Keleş vs. Garrido as well at your earliest convenience. They're both on YouTube.