I also qualified the question in the OP with "televised boxing", so there is a minimum standard of notability here. Preferably that phrasing could be extended to main or co-main events of any televised card, and/or to anything that you'd be likely to find after the fact on YouTube (the latter criteria is honestly best, as it allows for everyone to see & score and thereby properly evaluate one another's submissions; without that ability the debate is kind of worthless). If someone cared enough (and felt certain others would care) to bother spending time uploading it, then it can't be considered THAT obscure. Again, I never said I was expecting people to have seen and scored every measly deep-undercard 4-rounder on a low-budget prelim stream this year. So all this sneering at how insularly elitist my thread is can simmer on down now.
Sorry, IB... Murata-N'dam I is by far the worst robbery of not only this year, but also of the decade to date. Between the fact that N'dam barely made clean contact with a scoring area in the vast majority of rounds, the blown calls on multiple kds, and the fact that this outcome inspired universal incredulity among a group of posters that can't agree on anything, this not only takes the cake but inhales it in one single breath. Ulysse Jr.-Clagget is probably my choice for lesser known robbery, though. Yves dominated 7 rounds easily out of the 10 that were fought.
Even though i voted for Keleş vs. Garrido II, and even though I had it a shutout, with my Zhuravskiy vs. Danyo card being a little closer, and despite making this post about the latter contest: ...i actually still can see a very respectable case to be made for Zhuravskiy being ****ed over worse than Garrido. Keleş was backpedaling from the opening bell, never doing anything really effective, never rallying substantially against Garrido's inexorable onslaught. Zhuravskiy, on the other hand, faced an initially game and confident Danyo and proceeded to rip his game plan to shreds and expose his lack of a coherent plan B, visibly reduced Danyo's comfort level in the ring from a 10 all the way down to a 1, spoiled his boxing, and just beat the will outta the man. I kind of respect the dominance of that performance a little more than Garrido's monotonous bulldozing of Keleş, who came in with no discernible game plan other than surviving ten rounds (with a feather-fisted guy he already had gone the same distance with to get a gift draw in July) and hope for another gift. Neck and neck IMO.
To be fair, Keles-Garrido II was a dire decision and definitely qualifies as a legitimate robbery in that there was no possible way for any observer to objectively find six rounds to give to Keles.
Guys let's admit it...boxing is a ****ed up sport. It always has been. Imagine if the NFL changed the rules every year on what constitutes a legal catch, or if baseball changes the rules on sliding into second base or home plate? Oh wait.... Well at least NFL games aren't skewed in favor of popular teams at home like the Patriots?
Completely agree. The fact that the sanctioning bodies have their own personally selected refs (don't deny it) is all you need to know. I'm going to get massive flack for saying this but for me the biggest "robbery" of the year was GGG not getting the decision over Canelo. Don't get me wrong, I am sure there were bigger robberies out there but the one that drew the most attention was the GGG-Canelo fight and I thought it was very clear GGG won the fight. I'm not saying GGG dominated. He didn't but he pushed the action. He made the fight. He landed more effective punches. Had the fighters done the exact opposite Canelo would have been given a near unanimous decision. So, for me, the biggest "robbery" was the GGG-Canelo fight.
That's a fair opinion and I appreciate you illustrating the difference in your intended meaning of "biggest robbery". Which is the most significant robbery of the year is a conversation that is just as valid and worthwhile, but just happens to be a different conversation than what I was looking to spark in the OP (that is, which is the objective worst viewed in a vacuum, without factoring in the "importance" of a bout...at least over a certain reasonable minimum threshold of notability as mentioned earlier). I think a thread like that, focusing on your intended definition of the phrase "biggest robbery", is where a Horn vs. Pacquiao shoutout would be perfectly appropriate (even though I happen to disagree that it even was an incorrect decision, much less Pac getting "robbed"). In here it just doesn't belong, if people were careful to actually read the wording of the OP and understand what I was asking.
especially so given that for many folks--a critical factor that makes a bad result in one fight worse than a bad result i another is the magnitude of the fight. consider any of the fights mentioned by the OP, do those become bigger robberies if they were championship-level fights? Particularly given that the judges and referees would have been more carefully selected, i think so. bad results in common in domestic-level fights are not rare because, among other things, the criteria for selecting judges and referees is far less selective than in championship fights--ie, the officials have less training, less experience, but their workload is far higher. poor judges and poor referees are common in domestic-level fights. In those fights, referees might earn $250 per fight. An event with 2,000 attendance might have five fights on the card and the same three judges--each earning about the same as the referee--will score each of those five fights. Given those rates, judges and referees have to stay busy to earn a living and have very little time to do their homework before about, which combined with the inevitable fatigue, must lead to some fraction of the outcomes as "wrong" beyond that, a bad result--aka "robbery"--in a championship fight has far bigger implications
I've just watched Murata-HNN, damn that is one of the worst I've seen, ever. I don't think I gave HNN a round, guy was just punching air all night and running around, not to mention he got KD'd. On what planet could someone conceivably score a fight for him.
I'm really curious, of the 15 votes for "Other/IDKSAB", how many of those people actually watched the provided videos of either of the other poll options? @Café, you're honestly telling me you watched both of them before mouthing off in agreement with my critics and voting petulantly for the sarcastically/rhetorically included 3rd option?
True but there's nothing with having a time and place for everything. Forums are organized for ease of indexing & readability, in such a way that you have a thread for this, and separate thread for that (maybe loosely related and overlapping but still technically different subject), etc. (except with subjects like TKO6 and Mayweather-Pacquiao, for instance, which if they weren't merged into giant thread dumps would make the place unnavigable by flooding up every page nonstop) My title was "Absolute worst robbery of 2017", and in the opening post I set clear expectations for which connotation specifically was meant by that. Someone can make a "robbery that was the biggest deal" thread if they want.