According to Ring Magazine Mr Kovalev is No 2 P4P and Mr Golovkin is No 3 P4P

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by flashy k.o, Mar 5, 2016.


  1. The Akbar One

    The Akbar One Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    15,541
    5,275
    Dec 1, 2007
    Kovalev should be higher than Golovkin. Beating, Hopkins, Cleverly, and Pascal the first time, put his level of opposition above that of Golovkin. So he should be higher. Looking further. Ward has been inactive. Rigondeaux has been inactive, his only recent fight being one he took on short notice, and didn't look sharp. And Bradley shouldn't be rated that high p4p anyway. So yeah, Kovalev is in the right spot.
     
  2. Doc Everlast

    Doc Everlast Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,371
    10
    Aug 23, 2013
    I don't do P4P lists. But for those that do who don't factor inactivity into it I say your just a biased fan boy with a notepad and paper.:patsch Inactivity doesn't matter so might as well keep Ray Leonard at #1 forever. :dead
     
  3. acie2g

    acie2g Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,738
    1,302
    Jul 21, 2010
    Can't really hate on Kovalev's ranking he's one of the few guys who say they want the best and "actually tries" to prove it. He's gon out of his way to make fight's and has beaten decent comp.

    GGG is not deserving of his though, I see no reason for his ranking based off his comp. He's been side stepping fight's, and beating up bums that is not P4P worthy.
     
  4. alexthegreatmc

    alexthegreatmc Sound logic and reason. You're welcome! Full Member

    39,120
    1,801
    Sep 10, 2013
    Kovalev for sure, but not Golovkin. Ward and Rigo haven't done anything of note lately.
     
  5. JM22

    JM22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,487
    5
    Jun 5, 2008
    I have no problem with Kovalev but GG??? LMFAO