Ad Wolgast Vs. Alexis Arguello

Yeah, I don't use specific matchups to rank fighters or whatnot, just like to provoke responses on certain stylistic mash-ups. Especially an odd one, and I never explain because everyone has their own idea for what it would look like for a fighter from around the pre-Walker Law era to fight a fighter that is relatively modern.

I would allow a degree of clinching, but if overtly excessive they get pulled up for it. I'll assume these men aren't complete idiots and can respond to instructions for the benefit of a hypothetical discussionI don't know the ins-and-outs of Wolgasts resume, but like a lot of fighters from that era, he was DQ'd a few times. And as 'modern' boxers have an apparent advantage what with their training methods, I allow the older fighters to use the gloves of their choice, therefore they're bringing something else to the table. That's a different kind of hurt, and an awkward stylistic proposition in some caes (although I don't go for all this 'Fitz would beat a Heavyweight from today' bull**** some come out with)

 

He impressed me big time. He's a guy I'd like to delve into further. I know little of his resume.