Adalaide Byrd should never judge another boxing match again!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by diamondDave, Apr 19, 2008.


Which was the worse scorecard?

  1. 114-114

    10 vote(s)
    15.2%
  2. 118-110

    55 vote(s)
    83.3%
  3. 119-110

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. 117-111

    1 vote(s)
    1.5%
  1. diamondDave

    diamondDave Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,264
    7
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jul 21, 2004
    This is not the first time she has come out with a ridiculous scorecard like this! Its crap decisions like her's that start creating controversy where none existed and give boxing a bad name.
     
  2. istmeno

    istmeno Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,664
    5
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Oct 6, 2006
    bought and paid for by gbp
     
    Rock0052 likes this.
  3. bonao

    bonao Member Full Member

    284
    1
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Aug 24, 2004

    that's why we shouldn't allowed women to judge boxing,she probably like the affliction t shirt hopkins wore to the ring:patsch :patsch :patsch
     
    Jackal likes this.
  4. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,426
    1,551
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Aug 26, 2004
    I was in shock, I gave Hopkins 4 RDS, That Judge did it again
     
  5. lzolnier

    lzolnier Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,531
    36
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jan 20, 2007
    Wasn't she the judge in Golota-Ruiz, or was that against C. Byrd?
     
  6. diamondDave

    diamondDave Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,264
    7
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jul 21, 2004
    No that was actually Melvina Latham who screwed Golota out of the Byrd fight...another blind bird trying to judge boxing! Did you see how thick her glasses were before the Calzaghe fight?
     
  7. Quik

    Quik Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,845
    2
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jul 29, 2007
    was it her who gave Navarro the win 120-108 against Mijares a couple of months ago?
     
  8. Dorfmeister

    Dorfmeister Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,564
    4
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Aug 8, 2007
    She had never judged a Hopkins fight but she scored 119-107 Calzaghe against Lacy. I think Calzaghe won it but the fight was close so one point to Hopkins or one point to Calzaghe, it didn't make a difference as long as the two other judges had scored it clearly for Calzaghe. It was nothing like 116-112 Hopkins against Taylor...
     
  9. lmartin

    lmartin Member Full Member

    488
    11
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jan 6, 2007
    I say take her and Patricia Jarman and give them both positions on the National Organization of Women's fundraising committe if they promise to never get withing 10 mile of a boxing ring.
     
    don owens likes this.
  10. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Obsessed with Boxing banned

    30,325
    1
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Dec 17, 2004
    She should be tarred & feathered........................
     
  11. Sonny's jab

    Sonny's jab Guest

    I think 114-113 Hopkins is a reasonable score.
     
  12. Tunney5

    Tunney5 Active Member Full Member

    692
    1
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Nov 21, 2007
    Yes, she was obviously biased in favor of Hopkins for some reason.
     
  13. Tunney5

    Tunney5 Active Member Full Member

    692
    1
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Nov 21, 2007
    :yep Yes, and Julie Lederman too.
     
    dinosaurs likes this.
  14. Ted Stickles

    Ted Stickles Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,149
    797
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jun 24, 2007
    She is racist!!!!!!! hahahaha
     
  15. Tunney5

    Tunney5 Active Member Full Member

    692
    1
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Nov 21, 2007
    She obviously was biased for some reason.

    Perhaps she didn't want Hopkins to be beaten by "a white boy"... ;)