Adam Booth responds to Klitsckos

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by robpalmer135, Jul 9, 2010.


  1. the_brigand

    the_brigand I'll Eat Her Later... Full Member

    3,906
    0
    Oct 2, 2008
    Horse **** man, Klitschko's have a multi-fight deal with RTL, David Haye has no deal with ARD...if the fight goes to ARD that mens K2 has to pay RTL for breach of contract. Taking the fight away from RTL would just add extra cost to putting on the fight which once again K2 has to burden, not Haye.

    It's just another loophole by team Haye to try and find ways to make this negotiation uncomfortable for K2. I'm not falling for it.
     
  2. the_brigand

    the_brigand I'll Eat Her Later... Full Member

    3,906
    0
    Oct 2, 2008
    I'm perfectly fine with Haye-Adamek. After Adamek grounds Haye into pudding I'm sure Wlad will have no problems getting Adamek into the ring with him - because Adamek is not afraid to fight. :thumbsup
     
  3. bkamins

    bkamins Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,465
    2
    Sep 29, 2008
    This issue couldn't be any more simple. It certainly didn't require 137 posts to resolve. The Klitschkos want a 50/50 deal. Haye does not. He wants to keep the lucractive UK Sky Box payper view to himself because he knows that Wlad has a fixed contract with German TV. Wlad earns 3 million each fight, regardless of the opponent. That means that he would not benefit from unification or from Haye. On the other hand, Haye earns 5 pounds per buy. Haye's fans claim he sold 800,000 against Valuev. That's 4 million pounds. And a Wlad fight would be much bigger than the fight with Valuev. It might even sell 1 million. THat's means that Haye would earn 5 million pounds or more than twice as much on TV revenues as Wlad. It also means that he would benefit from Wlad and unification and Wald would receive nothing in return. It's an uneven did. Period. Let's move on.
     
  4. PolishPummler

    PolishPummler Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,752
    4
    Oct 15, 2005
    HBO want's Haye vs Adamek.

    Will the ducker be afraid to fight a mini Klitschko??
     
  5. robpalmer135

    robpalmer135 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,342
    0
    Jun 29, 2007
    no. Booth says thats the fight they want.
     
  6. robpalmer135

    robpalmer135 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,342
    0
    Jun 29, 2007
    Wlad should be better at negotiating tv deals. If his deal was worth the same as Hayes it wouldnt be a problem.
     
  7. robpalmer135

    robpalmer135 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,342
    0
    Jun 29, 2007
    Klitsckos deal is clear. 5 fights with RTL. It doesnt mean the next 5 fights. If ARD bidded more the fight would be there. Surley the Klitsckos want to make the most amount of cash to.

    come on you cant defend either fight here. you can say haye is ducking but so is wlad. there as bad as eachother.
     
  8. Toontoon

    Toontoon Boxing Junkie banned

    8,177
    1
    Jan 8, 2010
    Haye fighting Adamek and the chuckle brothers are fighting bums.:patsch
     
  9. loughlan

    loughlan Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,896
    0
    Feb 9, 2010
    Haye has priced himself out, spin it any way you want but you're not fooling anyone with your twisted logic and constant backpeddling.
     
  10. Little Pea

    Little Pea 'A' grade boxing fan Full Member

    11,750
    1
    Dec 7, 2007
    Well lets do this with Adamek.
    At least it's a good fight.
     
  11. Toontoon

    Toontoon Boxing Junkie banned

    8,177
    1
    Jan 8, 2010
    Of course he hasn't.

    He offered 50/50 with the highest bidders getting the fight.

    Wlad rejected that because he wants to stick with RTL.

    Haye then offers 50/50 with Wlad having the money from RTL and Haye keeping the money from the highest UK bidder.

    Wlad rejected that too.

    What Wlad wants is for the fight to be on RTL, presumably so the Klits can get through their 5 fight deal as soon as possible (which is why Vitali is eatin up bums) and negotiate a better one even if it means rejecting a better offer now which will cost Haye money, as well as having half of what Haye makes in the UK.
     
  12. bkamins

    bkamins Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,465
    2
    Sep 29, 2008

    If you don't have anything halfway intelligent to say, why post? It's simple. Haye should have accepted a straight 50/50 deal. It's more than generous. You know it, so stop arguing. :patsch
     
  13. Squire

    Squire Let's Go Champ Full Member

    9,120
    4
    Jun 22, 2009
    By getting a deal with a free to air TV company he has put himself in front of a far, far greater audience in Germany than Haye can through Sky box office. Now he's making his money through the football stadiums he fills. I'd ****ing love if a fighter over here had a deal with ITV and fought in Wembley and Old Trafford (and St James Park ;)). It would be great for British fight fans
     
  14. loughlan

    loughlan Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,896
    0
    Feb 9, 2010
    Yes he has, he is demanding more than 50-50 which is unjustifiable. He is the challenger in case you need reminding. Haye fans are just spinning to try to make it look like Wlad is at fault when it is as clear as day that Haye does not want this fight. RobPalmer told us just yesterday that money was not the issue meaning Haye has more rabbits to pull out of the hat if Klitschko was to agree to this ridiculous offer.
     
  15. bkamins

    bkamins Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,465
    2
    Sep 29, 2008

    Why do you read my posts above. It might help you make sense of this. You're obviously a very confused individual. It all boils down to Haye wanted to profit from his UK payperview deal and not split the money with Wlad. Simple, really.