Adam Booth responds to Klitsckos

I didn't say that they can force an opponent on Haye. I said they can decline a promotion unless they agree with the contract. They certainly can enforce that any opponent Haye chooses (for a voluntary defense!) has to sign options with Sauerland.

Sauerland gave the WBA belt to Haye under the condition that they get a minimum of 3 total further fights. That pretty much rules out no-option unification fights because that risks losing the belt without further options on it.

I am afraid we'll have to wait until Haye got rid of Sauerland (two more fights), then we'll see what happens. At Haye's level of (in)activity Vitali will probably be retired by then.

 

Yep I canceled two tickets. Me and my friend were going there, but he lost interest to it when Haye pulled off.

 

No you didn't fool. If you did you wouldn't have come to the answer you came to. Exchange rates don't lie chump.

Next time remember to check currency conversions on XE dot com before you type. Now show us mathematical proof or shut the **** up Haye hugger.

 

1) Show us the link proof or sit down and be quiet.

2) And? That sure as **** aint no 10 million is it? That's a bull**** lie increase of a whole 25% right there.

 

i'll be honest i dont know the ins and outs of the deal he has with sauerland. but is sauerland has him over a barrel then haye isnt the shrewd business man he is made out nto be, nor is he the coward he is made out to be.

i just wanna see him take on vitali because it is win win. if haye wins it sets up a mega bout with wlad. if vitali wins it is a fitting ending to a fantastic boxing story whereby two brothers hold every hw belt.

unlike most haye fans i actually like k2, maybe they do lowball some offers but i dont care about that ****, they are likeable people and outside english hw's i'd want them to win every time.

saying that i would love to see haye vs adamek at the m.e.n.

 

that isnt an increase of 25% mate. it is a decrease of 25% but an increase of 33%

 

lol makes me laugh considering your very next post

 

I guess at the end of the day Haye and Booth preferred the Sauerland contract even though the options and slave contract nature is similar, but at least Haye can easily "work off" the options against beatable opposition while building a brand in the UK.

Anyways, Booth must have been aware of all this before putting their name on the dotted line with Sauerland and now should stop blaming the problems arising from their contractual obligations to Sauerland on the Klitschkos.

 

Well if you want to be specific 10 million is an increase of 33% ON 7.5 million but the difference between 10 and 7.5 million is 25%.

 

Picking up on my exact pronunciation to skew it to something its not when you know full well what I am saying anyway is a dick move.

At least i quote facts and don't make **** up like the Haye huggers.

 

Oh and thanks. you've just pointed out how Haye's fans have bullshitted by 1/3 instead of 1/4.

Cheers for that! yet more proof you can never trust a Haye fan with the facts.

 

Similar location, how is that possible considering one was a football arena (Wlad - Haye/Chagaev) vs a closed venue (Haye - Ruiz)?

The prices for Wlad - Haye were cheap because they wanted to fill the arena and got an exceptionally good deal with Schalke (the football club). The cheapest tickets were 24 EUROs which was then unheard of for a Klitschko fight in Germany.

You need to compare ticket prices for closed venues like Haye - Ruiz to closed venue prices for the Klitschko fights in Germany otherwise you may as well be comparing apples to oranges.