Then maybe Haye should just have shut the **** up these last 18 months after he signed that slave contract with Sauerland? Instead he kept saying that always his "next" fight will 100% be against one of the Klitschkos while he knows he's locked into a slave deal with Sauerland. And Haye signed that **** contract himself, he knew exactly what he was getting himself into. He should take responsibility for that instead of trying to come up with excuses why the Klitschko fight can't happen right now and hopefully only later. Haye signed the multi-option slave contract with Sauerland. It's his own fault, not the Klit brothers fault.
Deep down, as much as he's an absolute wanker i'd secretly want Haye to win, because i'm from England and he's representing the country i live in. BUT.... I'm not too patriotic to see past common sense. It's not difficult to see how either Klitschko would beat Haye, and deep down i actually quite like both Klitschko brother's.
:huh:huh We obviously weren't watching the same interview. Boente agreed with open negotiations, he just said that negotiations hadn't started yet. Boente is asked about the German TV side of things, and his response is: "Just as an example, if RTL paid 3million euros, another television station offered 4million euros...the difference is 1million...you get 500,000 and we get 500,000...we could find an agreement about those 500,000 because in the end we're talking about really big numbers not small numbers between german tv companies" [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9CmRXZm6RI[/ame]
Haye won't fight Vitali. It's never gonna happen. He wants to fight and beat Wlad to become the no.1 HW and then retire. If he beats Vitali he will just replace him as the no.2 in the division. Not to mention if he loses he will never get a chance to fight Wlad and become the HW champion of the world. Haye is not a risk taker, quite the opposite.
I love the way all the Klitschko fans who were claiming David Haye as a coward and ducking and lying about the negotiations are now clamouring over each other to say how bad an idea public negotiations are. I don't care about negotiations, I just want to see a fight ... making it public is bad for business. \ :silly
i dont see whats wrong with being open and clear on who wants what and whats been agreed,what hasnt been agreed and why or why not.
He didn't agree at all. He didn't even reply to that. His response was that negotiations hadn't begun. Well, of course they hadn't begun because Booth was asking for the negotiations to be public when they do start. His response of "we aren't in negotiation" was strange.