Really? You think that Ruiz would beat Peter, Chambers, Arreola or Chagaev? You are an example of delusional fan. Read some facts before you post that kind of stupidity. Here you go: John Ruiz http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_id=4655&cat=boxer
what will probably happen is that all 3 will fight and beat thier mandatories,but will have already agreed to fight each other before hand. i would want haye to fight vitali first being the older one,wlad has time to hang around more. i think vitali really cant box as well as wlad. vitalis footwork and quickness is worse also. i think vitalis defense is worse too. i wonder how many people really would think klitschko win if they re watched all of klitschkos fights then watched all of haye fights,then came back,and style wise decided who is better and who has more chance of winning agaisnt the other?. ide applaud any man who could re watch all of the klitschkos fights all over again in full not in highlights!.
That's the way it's looking isn't it....they're just confirming what we all knew all along :yep Either you've got something to hide, or you haven't. That's what Booth is saying here, and who backed down? It's also interesting that the Klits are trying to push for a VITLAY fight now too. Can't hide WALDOS fragile glass jaw forever Manny, man up and take the fight :deal
"both ruiz and valuev could beat povetkin ..." quote where i said chageav?,no ,didnt think you could!. i said ect,meaning pvetkin and adamek really. but potentially he COULD beat them all,why no klit never face him either?. i didnt say WOULD either,i said COULD!. there is a difference. tell me style wise, why he couldnt beat none of them?. He gave most opponents a tough ugly hard fight,and got robbed twice by valuev and the germans.
hahah,this is lame. how about toney when he was on good form? how about holyfield on good form? why did they not fight ruiz?. all those guys are ****,they never beat any great heavyweights,most of them were fat, slow,predictable weak excuses for heavyweights. they have beaten a lot of poor fighters.records dont mean **** sometimes. calzaghe was unbeaten,but hes still a nobdy with nobodies and past it fighters on his undefeated record!. lol,poor argument. sure they have beaten people who are poor,with "good records",and there not many good people to fight. they sure havent fought the toughest out there to date still. And youve still not answered all my questions. no talk on how haye is a worse fighter. no talk on how the klitchkos are better boxers?.lol. Fail my friend,faillll.
What's interesting is in 99% of your posts you're talking about David Haye. You're obsessed. In you're other posts you're talking about the Klits. Who's the Haye dick rider here then?
he won the fight by KO you fool,haha.(vs fragomeni) the way haye wins is more impressive,and hayes calibre throughout his career is more impressive,hes had much more skilled and dangerous fighters on the whole. Haye has already conquered and unfied a division pretty much. the klits have been in no rush to unify,shown by thier lack of work to make fights happen v haye,valuev,themselves!. Haye has more impressive wins and was more entertaining in doing so.
yep he hurt a 38 year old Fragomeni, then did his usual rabbit punching tactics to get Fragomeni down. cheat.duck.cheat.duck.
You wrote "both ruiz and valuev could beat povetkin ect." Who did you mean by etc? And Ruiz would not beat even chicken Povetkin. Have you even seen Povetkin's fights? Ancient Holyfield was robbed against Valuev. And most people think that he was better than Haye against him. As so was Chagaev.
Yes, because fights are always won on height aren't they? How many of the guys that owned the Klits were taller than Haye? Lewis and Sanders I believe. Both in their late 30's and disinterested yet they tore up WALDO and VITLAY like they were wet tissue. Haye is prime, and the Klits are older now, much older. Let's see these public negotiations, no more bull****, no more rhetoric. It seems one side wants them and the other doesn't...I wonder why :think