Adamek BJ Flores OFF. Possible rematch with Cunningham looming.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by maciek4, Jan 11, 2009.


Page 3 of 3
  1. Axe

    Axe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,013
    3
    Jan 23, 2005
    The Iguanophile I'm quoting has me confused too.

    Is that a decent looking girl in your avatar? :huh
     
    Axe, Jan 12, 2009
    Axe, Jan 12, 2009
    #31
  2. Axe

    Axe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,013
    3
    Jan 23, 2005
    Good to read some well-earned props from a longtime Paul Briggs supporter. Respect. :good
     
    Axe, Jan 12, 2009
    Axe, Jan 12, 2009
    #32
  3. Axe

    Axe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,013
    3
    Jan 23, 2005
    btw maciek4, what is your source for this fight being definitely off?

    Flores was still a small possibility last I heard...
     
    Axe, Jan 12, 2009
    Axe, Jan 12, 2009
    #33
  4. rumour24tiger

    rumour24tiger Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,718
    2
    Jan 27, 2006
    No need to jump right into Adamek-Cunningham 2.

    That was a hard earned win from Adamke, the former WBC light heavy champ. Let him enjoy the title vs a Banks or a Braithwaite, first. Maybe Cunningham could have a tune up on the same show, steadily build anticipation.

    The rematch does make sense, but the loser will always been more keen for the rematch than the winner. The winner normally wants to reap the rewards a bit, and the loser of a close fight is usually the one desperate to get back in there. Hopefully Showtime will have some extra money for them to fight again. Build up to it, not rush into it, I say.
     
    rumour24tiger, Jan 13, 2009
    rumour24tiger, Jan 13, 2009
    #34
Page 3 of 3