Adamek -Chambers - face 2 face

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by sixkiller, Apr 19, 2012.


  1. PolishPummler

    PolishPummler Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,752
    4
    Oct 15, 2005
    Tomasz Adamek - 45-2

    Haye + Chisora - 40-5

    :lol::deal
     
  2. MaliBua

    MaliBua Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,869
    348
    Jun 20, 2010
    :lol:

    Man with your posts-:huh:rofl
     
  3. SweetHome_Bama

    SweetHome_Bama Loyal Member banned

    32,270
    3
    Apr 30, 2010
  4. PolishPummler

    PolishPummler Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,752
    4
    Oct 15, 2005
    1 round after the fight ends?

    Interesting.:think
     
  5. Bobo

    Bobo Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,050
    5
    Feb 20, 2011
    Adamek is probably like 6'3 because he was taller than Arreola(listed 6'3), Aguilera(listed 6'3), and slightly Jennings.

    This content is protected


    This content is protected
     
  6. SweetHome_Bama

    SweetHome_Bama Loyal Member banned

    32,270
    3
    Apr 30, 2010
    Thought it was 12 rounds, that case, Eddie UD or possible Tko or KO in 9
     
  7. Bathory

    Bathory Active Member Full Member

    763
    1
    Jan 10, 2012
    You really believe Tomaso is so bad for Eddie to "comfortably" beat him?

    Like I said, if that happens it's time for retirement.
     
  8. PolishPummler

    PolishPummler Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,752
    4
    Oct 15, 2005
    Love the predictions

    Better yet i will love the post fight excuses.
     
  9. John_Ortiz

    John_Ortiz Active Member Full Member

    524
    0
    Apr 1, 2012
    If u think Adamek is a better boxer then Eddie.. U clearly dont box... & Adamek going to get countered alot..
     
  10. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,411
    15,519
    Jul 19, 2004
    Adamek really should have returned to cruiserweight.

    I think Chambers will wind up being a bad style match up for Tomasz. I'm not saying Chambers will win, but this will not be an easy fight for either guy.

    I'm very interested in this one.
     
  11. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,411
    15,519
    Jul 19, 2004
    I would probably say Chambers is the better overall boxer, but if I broke it down further I'd say Adamek is a better offensive boxer and Chambers is better defensively.

    That said, Adamek possesses a few intangibles that even out any tactical edge Chambers has over him.

    Should be evenly matched and competitive throughout I would imagine.
     
  12. turbina

    turbina Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,783
    7
    Apr 17, 2008
    You have done nothing but say Eddie will school Adamek easy, since you started posting about this fight. By completely disregarding Adamek and basically not giving him any credit, it shows either incredible bias, or you not having seen Adamek very much.

    You're clearly biased as **** since Chambers is your buddy and all. But you should at least be able to see that Adamek does pose a serious challenge and threat to Chambers. He has gone against the odds before, and won almost every time he has stepped up, this alone should tell you about his personality, and his fighting spirit.

    You can pick Chambers if you like, nothing wrong with that. But by seemingly brushing Adamek off your shoulders as you are... well, it sure seems Chambers doesn't share that opinion with you by putting in all the work you say he is.
     
  13. Yeah I dont know. I saw a pic of Arreola where he was shorter than 6'2" Paul Williams so I thought Arreola was really 6'1."
    But I was just curious anyway. Height means very little in this sport.
     
  14. the commentator

    the commentator Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,468
    270
    Oct 26, 2011
    chambers should really try his luck at cruiserweight, he surely can get a title there. both him and adamek are just bulked up cruiserweights anyways....