Adamek-Chambers scorecards

its hard not to...
was trying to give some close rounds to chambers,but he still come up short

 

McGrain ******ed. This was a worse decision than Bradley vs. Pacquiao. (which, btw, was scored correctly by one judge)

 

By the way, BE, your new troll alt isn't very funny.

 

Effective body punching is indeed often overlooked or dismissed outright by fans and judges more accustomed to watching for headshots.

You people are acting as though Tomasz put on some classic Mexican-style clinic. Oh yeah, he was a real ****ing McCallum out there. All those grazing rights deflected off the bottom of Chambers' elbows. Massively "underrated".

 

1.2 more slaps landed by Eddie per round.

This is the worst decision in Boxing history.

 

ha ha my father says british laborers lose jobs from not working hard! If a worker not work hard a boss should sack!

 

The only thing that is stopping your troll account from being complete is mistyping words.

Grammar sucks spelling = perfect.

Try another ALT account..

 

I had it 115-113 Adamek but both looked bad but at least Chambers had a excuse.

Flores's commentating was horrid,he was blatantly pro Chambers.

 

why you hate on me friend? I am only 14 years of age and learn english not long ago. I am 100% Polish and proud as are my grandfather before me. Goral is my favourite warrior of boxing.

 

Very true..

and I had it 116-112 Adamek.

Flores needs to be replaced.

 

Anyone who scored it for Chambers is an idiot that doesn't know how to score and was clearly influenced by their own bias/the bias of the commentary team.

 

Every top 10 name at HW is impressive for Adamek. Quite a run at HW for his style and his size. Hell he might even be champion if it wasn't for the K-bros

 

i'm sick of arguing with ******s who cannot score so allow me to once again I'll copy and paste what I've posted to other morons in regard to scoring this one.....i'ma teach you kids how to score a fight:

......lemme break it down for you:

scoring criteria number 1: clean punching (who landed the more clean shots throughout the course of the round)- very few rounds did adamek land more clean punches, in fact he landed only a handful of clean punches all night, you don't get points for blocked shots, they gotta be CLEAN

scoring criteria number 2: effective aggression- key word EFFECTIVE meaning that your aggression is benefiting your plan and not the opponents which it did in this fight as adameks pressure led to chambers countering and being able to implement his plan of countering, aka adameks aggression was not effective, it helped chambers if anything.

scoring criteria number 3: ring generalship (who made the fight their type of fight)- do we even need to discuss this one, it was clearly chambers type of fight in there, he did what he wanted when he wanted, adamek was unable to sustain any sort of succesful gameplan

scoring criteria number 4: defence- lets not even go here......13% connect for adamek-33% for chambers means clearly Chambers wins on the defense tip.




Now use these and score the fight properly......hitting gloves/arms/air is not anything to score favorably, in fact it's a credit to the other guys defense.

 

I rewatched the 1st round with no sound and have actually scored it for Adamek. Eddie landed 1 nice right hand a 1 slappy left hook, while Adamek scored a nice combo to the body and was much busier and the aggressor all round.

:deal