Adamek like Haye is better being a lighter heavyweight

:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

:think

 

David Haye

WBA Cruiserweight Champion
WBO Cruiserweight Champion
WBC Cruiserweight Champion
Ring Magazine Cruiserweight Champion
WBA Heavyweight Champion

Adamek

WBC Light Heavyweight Champion
IBF Cruiserweight Champion

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

Adamek straight up got owned by a one-armed Chambers, yet you're willing to list that as one of his best wins? I know a win is a win, but when we evaluate and rate wins, we're not even going to take into account the fact that he fought a one-armed guy who outpunched him? And he still got a "hometown decision?"


Plus, you are simply willing to overlook Haye's KO win against Chisora...


Like it's been stated before, very few non-polish people would favor Adamek over Haye if they fought. That's a fact.



But Adamek gets love because he's the busier fighter, and he doesn't talk ****. All that "Old-school warrior" talk and stupid **** like that only gets you so far. He can have all the heart, chin, respect, adoration, and anything else, but if he ever gets in the ring with Haye, at some point he's going to need the physical tools. And in my honest opinion, he just doesn't have them. Not even close.

 

Exagerate much? You must have only followed IB's RBR

The judges got it right!

Fact remains Adamek is and always will be more respected!:hi:

 

There is nothing Adamek can do for his legacy. He got beat by a one armed Chambers.

 

by who?

you and a few other ******s online

 

Fact remains Adamek is and always will be more respected!:hi:

 

yes, by a guy on line called "polish plubmer" who is, in real life a Polish Plumber.

think there is any bias in there?

 

Haye is regarded as a clown..

Fact remains Adamek is and always will be more respected!:hi:

 

1. Haye fought and KO'd Audley Harrison (who is as big as michael grant) in 3 rounds, Harrison vs Grant is actually a toss up, both are awful.

2. Haye would easily stop Arreola who is one of the most undeserving hype jobs in recent memory, his best win being an old Jameel McCline.

3. Adamek lost handily to small, no power Chambers, Haye as fast if not faster than Chambers and punched approx 178 times as hard.

Haye has been a bit of a dissapointment at Heavyweight, that's true but anyone without blatent bias would struggle badly to rank Adamek as a better fighter H2H than Haye, and Haye also shades resume.

 

I still think Povetkin and Pulev have something to offer but , on the whole, I do agree. Chambers would be solid in most eras but he's already shown that he's not HW championship quality...

 

would

the key word Haye fans use whenever they match-up thier idol against any boxer

why's it a key word? because the diva will not fight anyone not named Klitschko

 

Why is that Haye fans are accepting the twisting only in Haye's favour?

Haye didn't look good vs Valuev but that official win was his best achievement at HW
while when Adamek didn't look good vs Chambers this WIN is more of a lose?

Just trying to find a logic here.

Another one:

why did you omitted that Adamek was also a "Ring Magazine Cruiserweight Champion"
as well he also became lineal chmpion at that time? Why twisting arguments again?