Adamek/Quarry: Who win and why?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by booradley, Apr 28, 2010.


  1. booradley

    booradley Mean People Kick Ass! Full Member

    39,848
    16
    Aug 29, 2006
    I've taken quiet a liking to Tomasz Adamek, and I was a Jerry Quarry fan when I was a kid. Who wins this match up, and why?
     
  2. tommy the hat

    tommy the hat Active Member Full Member

    1,151
    10
    Sep 2, 2008
    Jerry Quarry would win because he faced the toughest opposition at heavyweight and would also be the stronger of the two. Quarry was also quite sound with his boxing skills and wasnt just a puncher, so Adamek's slickness as a boxer would be negated imo. Quarry by late round stoppage of decision over a game Adamek, who have his moments and could possibly cut Quarry along the way.
     
  3. Muchmoore

    Muchmoore Guest

    Quarry pretty easily. TBH Adamek doesn't even deserve a thread like this, his biggest win at HW is over Arreola while Quarry beat Lyle, Shavers, Patterson, and an unbeaten Mac Foster. Big difference.

    Adamek isn't going to outslug the guy who outslugged Earnie Shavers and isn't going to be able to outbox a gy who was able to outpoint Floyd Patterson. Quarry wins whether he wants to turn it into a brawl or boxing match.
     
  4. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,997
    28,008
    Feb 15, 2006
    I am going with Quarry untill Admek shows me something prety special.
     
  5. Sardu

    Sardu RIP Mr. Bun: 2007-2012 Full Member

    3,581
    55
    Jan 22, 2008
    JQ by decision.
     
  6. Boilermaker

    Boilermaker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,372
    475
    Oct 6, 2004
    True, but Adamek is not exactly an ATG himself, is he?

    i actually think i would take Adamek at the right odds, but they would ahve to be very long odds. He is very unproven at the weight, compared to Quarry. This is a good close fight, but Quarry must start heavy favourite.
     
  7. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    58,684
    13,858
    Jul 28, 2009
    Adamek has been growing on me too, Boo. But I think the speed and mobility that he's shown at heavyweight against guys like a very poor version of Golota and a not very dedicated big man like Arreola would not really stick out against guys like Quarry and most of the seventies patrol who are smaller and better conditioned than those fellas. As others stated, until he shows something more, with some better athletes at that weight, I think Quarry would win any type of fight he wants to make too.
     
  8. globenerd

    globenerd Guest

    Jerry Quarry would probably be undisputed heavyweight champion if he were in his prime today. The guy came along in the deepest era of HW history, and knocked off a lot of tough guys. Compare that to today, maybe the weakest era of HW history, and you've got yourself a serious contender. He may be too small for Wlad, but I think he beats everyone else out there right now, and maybe Wlad too if he were to catch him a good one.
     
  9. Son of Gaul

    Son of Gaul Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,628
    31
    Feb 16, 2010
    Well, the burden of proof is now on you to name a current top 10 HW besides Wlad and Vitali who would stay in the top 10 in any decade after the 50's.
     
  10. globenerd

    globenerd Guest

    Machen is not one to sneeze at either. I'm not convinced he wouldn't beat any of the three guys you just named. You're going to have to do better than that.
     
  11. Vantage_West

    Vantage_West ヒップホップ·プロデューサー Full Member

    20,872
    647
    Jul 11, 2006
  12. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    129
    Aug 13, 2009

    Doubtful Quarry would be the undisputed Champion in any era. He would always be a tough contender that came up short against the very best. He would be a clear number #3-#4 today as he was during his prime run. My guess is that in the 2000s he would lose to guys like Byrd, Lewis, Wlad, and Vitali in respectful efforts but probably have wins over guys like Tua, Rahman, Oleg, Arreola, and Peter with an odd weird setback loss or two. He would certianly lay claim to an alphabet title at some point.
     
  13. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    52,223
    27,729
    Jan 3, 2007

    This is probably about the most reasonable and accurate assesment that I have so far heard on this thread.
     
  14. Son of Gaul

    Son of Gaul Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,628
    31
    Feb 16, 2010
    Either they aren't that great or you are simply biased. Machen was still a very dangerous fighter when Quarry fought him...

    So back to the original topic... Who's place would Povetkin take? Remember who was in the top 10 back in the 60's and 70's(not to mention a comparatively weak 80's where legit HW's still resided despite Tyson and Holmes' dominance). Clay, Liston, Frazier, Patterson, Quarry, Foster, Mathis, Ellis, Lyle, Chuvalo, Foreman, Norton, Shavers, Holmes, Cooney, Tyson, Tillis, Smith, Spinks, Ruddock, Holyfield...on and on and on...? I really don't think any of the current crop of HWs would take any of these guys places...
     
  15. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    129
    Aug 13, 2009

    We really don't know enough about Povetkin to fairly throw him against the well established names of the past 3 decades, that's a rather mute point. As of now, he's a carefully matched prospect that could thrive just on the fringe in about any decade until its time to cash in. Shavers, Foreman, Ruddock, Norton, and many of the guys you listed feasted on roughly the same level of fighters that Povetkin has before being pushed into the real spotlight against the Tysons, Alis, Fraziers, or what have you.