Adamek's too straight up, too hittable and too slow (relative to the speed he needs to be to have success against Vitali) to do anything more than make it to the finish line. His punching technique also seems to have got pretty ragged in his last two fights, due to the height and weight of his opponents. Adamek used to throw pretty crisp combos at CW and was doing so in his first few HW fights, but against Grant and McBride he was winging his punches like mad, and they seemed to look like fly swats in the effect they were having. His one successful punch will be the quick short right to the body then out again. If he goes headhunting Vitali he'll get battered into submission.
Delusional, you are. straw man = straw man argument = straw man fallacy, etc. Get more education, you should.
I favor Vitali, but I'm definitely looking forward to this one and I think Adamek has a slim chance, but a real chance. :smoke
artyartyarty Remember these guys??? Well, they just might be all over this forum come Sept. 11th. This content is protected
Other than being tall what skill set do those guys posses to prepare Adamek for Vitali Klitschko? :huh Nothing. Part of the problem with fighting Vitali is you can't get proper sparring. There are no other fighters that have his awkward skill set. Adamek would be better of working on a gameplan and other things than wasting his time sparring with those bums that will not help him with a damn thing.
Rummy, I know one thing Adamek will at least give it his all and try unlike that disgrace David Haye or Kevin Johnson or some of the other recent Klitschko opponents. :good
Rest my case, I do. "Your" clearly too thick to understand the concept of a straw man. Blame you, I do not.
Excuse me good sir, I meant to say ''you are'' or ''You're'' Forgive me:rasta well it looks like I know what it means now, thanks for the info [ame]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man[/ame]