Adamek ~vs~ Calzaghe?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Rumsfeld, Dec 12, 2008.


Page 3 of 3
  1. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,541
    16,033
    Jul 19, 2004
    I'm not seeing it. No way Calzaghe hurts Adamek, and Adamek has a pretty good punch output himself (something which was not on display last night, against the freakishly tall Cunningham).
     
    Rumsfeld, Dec 12, 2008
    Rumsfeld, Dec 12, 2008
    #31
  2. The Prophet

    The Prophet Active Member Full Member

    1,352
    0
    Jul 26, 2008
    You're right, he's extremely slower than Calzaghe. You're out of your mind if you can't see that. It doesn't matter who hits harder and if this fight were to ever happen, which it won't, Calzaghe would never come in at 200, but probably more around 185. It wouldn't matter though. Its Calzaghe's speed, footwork, illusiveness, and ring generalship that will win the fight. Adamek will not be able to land any clean blows, while Calzaghe will spin him like a top and pop in and out and land at will. You're nuthuggery blinds you.:-(
     
    The Prophet, Dec 12, 2008
    The Prophet, Dec 12, 2008
    #32
Page 3 of 3