**Adamek vs Chambers** Who'd win?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Tackleberry, Jun 9, 2010.


  1. redz215

    redz215 Active Member Full Member

    955
    17
    Oct 4, 2008
    i think Chambers speed would bother adamek although it would be a much competitive fight because chambers doesn't use his foot speed or movement of dawsons...but with eddies shell defense i think he could block everything adamek has to offer while making him pay after or while adamek doesn't connect i see this fight going long distance unless chambers becomes aggressive n goes after adamek
     
  2. Boggle

    Boggle Grozny State Of Mind Full Member

    48
    24
    Dec 9, 2009
    I voted for Chambers, but now I'm starting to regret it. This is a fight that should get made. Let's face it, no one can compete with SNV, so the smaller fighters should duke it out. Like little children in a sandbox.

    Kidding aside, I think Chambers is quicker than Adamek. However, Goral is good at finding ways to win. You could argue that Chambers has fought better competition at heavyweight, but he lost against the two best fighters he faced (Wlad, Povetkin).

    They should do a Super 6 tourney of the smaller heavyweights, then feed them to Sugar Nikolay.

    Giant's gotta eat... and he's hungry.

    This content is protected
     
  3. popejking

    popejking Adamek Full Member

    4,160
    1
    Mar 27, 2009
    Chambers is not close to be as good boxer as Dawson. Adamek was also sick in that fight, because of losing too much weight. Chambers hits a lot harder than Dawson, but at HW Adamek is much more powerful too, than he used to be in the 175. Adamek is fast, possibly Chambers is faster, but Adamek has this mental edge.
     
  4. tays001

    tays001 ESB ELITE SQUAD Full Member

    15,124
    7
    Mar 6, 2006
    Chambers is better then estrada who troubled Adamek alot i think Chambers beats him down and stopps him on cuts
     
  5. freelaw

    freelaw Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,143
    916
    Nov 17, 2007
    :lol:

    They should moove LHW limit to 190 and cruiser to 215 maybe...
     
  6. Loufatski

    Loufatski Boxing Junkie banned

    9,960
    6
    Jul 31, 2004
    Chambers did zero to Wlad and lost to Povetkin. How is he going to beat Adamek? Where? When? I'd like to see it.
     
  7. RAW

    RAW Active Member Full Member

    1,208
    0
    Mar 26, 2010
    i think adamek's work rate would win the fight for him on points. i don't see a ko for either fighter & since adamek is a rising star, he would probably get the nod on the judges' cards.
     
  8. PolishPummler

    PolishPummler Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,752
    4
    Oct 15, 2005
    That was 3 years ago....

    I too can make excuses.:thumbsup
     
  9. Ripple633

    Ripple633 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,635
    1
    Jun 2, 2009

    How is Chambers a poor man USS when he hits harder has a better jab and a better offense overall? The only difference is that Chambers is fighting a division where everyone is bigger then him. I assure you if Chambers was in the cruiserweight division he would beat Cunningham.

    Chambers is just as slick as Dawson, the only difference is that their styles are different, and Chambers is fighting in a different weight division.
     
  10. Ripple633

    Ripple633 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,635
    1
    Jun 2, 2009

    How is that an excuse? Chambers is a different boxer now because he's in better shape and has a higher work-rate. Yes boxers improve over time.
     
  11. PolishPummler

    PolishPummler Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,752
    4
    Oct 15, 2005
    Just like Adamek has clearly improved and is a different fighter.Not the same guy who fought Chad at LHW.