Adamek vs Cunningham II this Sat. night...Why doesn't anyone care???

Yeah, HW Adamek is nowhere near as heavy-handed p4p as Margarito. :think

Other than that, though...

 

Absolutely. Solis is a slob but he's got the talent to beat anyone and it would have been an intriguing matchup..especially considering that it would have been do or die for him.

 

I don't think anybody was really looking forward to it, though.

Adamek vs. Solis might be a bit more "meaningful" to the division (although neither of them ever beats either Klitschko, on their best day) but Adamek vs. Cunningham is guaranteed to be more exciting.

 

3 KD's to none/

Adamek stopped opponents Steve did not.

 

Um, yeah, did you see in the line above where you underlined how it said "Better cheen"?

 

What common opponents, exactly? :huh

None at Cruiser. (Adamek fought Pineda, Jalusic, Bell, Gomez, Cunningham himself, Banks, and Gunn - none of whom fought Cunningham).

None at heavy. (Cunningham has only fought Gavern. Adamek hasn't...)

 

Adamek will probably win, just because he got a better chin and more power

 

That's not what i was saying.

What i was saying is Adamek KD'd and stopped more opponents...besides Wlodarczyk taking a knee in there 2nd fight i cant think of very many USS KD's scored in recent years.....so enlighten me.

 

Would Adamek have stopped Huck? (who, make no mistake, is better than anyone from Adamek's CW run except Cunningham...yes, including Bell...)

 

atsch

 

IB the level of ignorance and hate displayed by you when it comes to EE fighters really makes you look like a complete ****ing tool.

Accept boxing for what it has become..no matter how much it hurts you.

 

You continue to miss the mark. Keep at it, William Tell.

 

No problem....im missing the mark and you can continue to make an ass out of yourself.

When they say hate is blinding you my ******ed friend are on Hellen Keller level.

 

OK, we've dueled to a draw in archaic references. Touche.

You're still 100% wrong about me having some vendetta against Eastern Euro boxers.

If you were being honest with yourself (or a little more attentive, or both) you'd know that full well.

Why else would GGG, Pirog, Kotelnik, Chakhkiev, Pulev, Chagaev, Khurtsidze, Zaveck, Jirov, Kovalev, etc be among my absolute favorite recent boxers and ones of whom you can find countless examples of me speaking positively?

You're just salty over specifically my healthy dose of criticism of a few over-hyped Poles (Adamek, Proksa, Wach) to counter-balance the undue hype they get from you and others desperate to have a transcendent star in the sport to claim.

I don't even have an agenda with Poles, dumbass. :deal

I used to love Adamek, before he moved to heavyweight.

Wolak, Diablo, Braveheart, Masternak, Kolodziej - all cool in my book...and I've said so on here, repeatedly. (although Diablo is slipping badly, no longer as exciting as he used to be due to becoming trigger-shy, and got a gift over Palacios)

Poland has a long proud tradition of pugilistic warriors. They've even had some very good fighters. What they don't currently have is anyone great - and you're all grasping at straws trying to prop up whoever you can to pass them off as great. Adamek being the prime example.

He certainly had the potential to be a great cruiserweight. He isn't and never will be a great heavy, so you need to do some accepting and STFU about it.

...and that's all there is to it.

 

I have a real hard time picking the winner in this one. I consider to put some money on Cunningham, cos I don´t think he is as big underdog as the odds show. But I´m just not sure he will win.

Please help me and let me know who win AND why?

Why do I think that Cunningman wins:

- He outboxed Adamek in the first fight and now when Adamek is bigger, he is also slower and Cunningham should have easier job in outboxing him. Adamek has now getting used to fight big slow man, who pick their shots. Now he is again facing a quick boxer, who throws a lot of punches. Might be hard to adjust to.

- Althought bout boxers have had tough fights, I see Cunningham as the fresher man. Adamek took a horrible beating from Klitschko and that must have taking something of off him. After that he faced two boxers who did not throw nearly as many punches as Cunningham and then he was knocked down by Walker. I just have a feeling that Adamek is getting tired and old. So many tough fights. He has 20 bouts more that Cunningham. And I think that these heavyweight bouts take more out of him than the tough cruiserweight bouts that Cunningham has been in.

- Speed difference. Cunningham was the quicker man in the first fight and after that Adamek has been builted to be a heavyweight. He has slowned down, altought he still looks quick against heavyweights. Cunningham has been used to fight quick guys, quicker that the heavyweight Adamek.

Why do I still have a feeling that Adamek night very well stop Cunningham?

- Cunninghams weak spot is his chin and the fact that cos of his activity he takes a lot of hard shots. Adamek dropped him 3 times in their first fight and now Adamek is a lot stronger. He is 20 pounds heavyer and he has hurt much bigger guys. He should have even better chances of hurting Cunningham this time.

Well, Cunningham has never been stopped.


So, will Cunningham outbox the slowned Adamek or will Adamek will be too strong for Cunningham?