Adamek vs Cunningham: Who "really" won? Poll

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by dwighttsharpe, Dec 23, 2012.


  1. Flexe

    Flexe Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,904
    3
    Apr 17, 2011
    Cunningham, and convincingly.
     
  2. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    23
    Oct 27, 2010
    :deal
     
  3. macp1

    macp1 Guest

    Nah, I'm just not into ***** boxing. I dont think a scared fighter, running away throwing little pitter patter jabs because he's afraid to get KO'd should win a FIGHT. USS would beat Adamek day and night at TAG however.
     
  4. D_Andrade

    D_Andrade Guest

    It was a carbon copy of Quillins last fight dropped his opponent 3 times in 3 rounds then got his ass kicked for the other 9 and still won!
     
  5. bw51

    bw51 Active Member Full Member

    1,151
    89
    Dec 12, 2012
    steve cunningham fought a good strategy but adamek was landing some good shots and the heavier shots. there were times while adamek was hunting that cunnigham was too inactive off the back foot.

    it cud have gone either way but it def was not a robberry.
     
  6. Bill1234

    Bill1234 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,314
    499
    Jan 28, 2007
    Cunningham was more active than Adamek was. While Adamek was busy walking forward and not throwing, Cunningham was busy throwing stiff jabs and right hands.
     
  7. bw51

    bw51 Active Member Full Member

    1,151
    89
    Dec 12, 2012
    agreed to the above but only in the rounds that he won, unfortunately in the boxing system of scoring 10 to 9 rounds are subjective to many different things, qaulity vs quantity. not compubox.

    in the rounds that cunningham lost it was bc he was taking breather and adamak was getting to him in the corner and landing some decent shots in the middle of the ring and made cunningham put on his ear muffs. cunningham fought a good strategy but as adamke was constantly coming forward, USS was at times boxing but at other times borderline running.

    people are just too caught up with flash. the jab was landing well in the first half of the fight, but in the second half USS did not look as sharp.
     
  8. klion22

    klion22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,781
    355
    Aug 4, 2007
    I can't see how anyone can see it for Adamek. Unless if you are biased. Adamek was the epitome of ineffective aggression. Cunningham landed the much telling blows. Close but clear win for USS.
     
  9. ButtBread

    ButtBread @bettingboxing Full Member

    630
    0
    Nov 24, 2012
    Updated judging criteria:
    1) Clean and effective and/or blocked and ineffective punching in last 20 seconds of round.
    2) Walking forward.
    3) Lack of "flash."
    4) Jabs defended with face.
     
  10. macp1

    macp1 Guest

    You could 'tell' by looking at Adamek's and Cunningham's faces that Cunningham landed the more effective punches?? LOL
     
  11. Ivo

    Ivo Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,351
    81
    Jul 20, 2004

    :good
     
  12. MattMattMatt

    MattMattMatt Guest

    Can you list the David Haye fights that he won or lost by fighting negatively? Wlad, Valuev and Abdul? That's 3 fights out of 28. You seem to have forgotten that Haye has 24 KOs in 26 victories. The Wlad fight was terrible, but people seem to have such short memories, apparently Haye's entire career happened between the end of 2009 and the middle of 2011.
     
  13. gobblock

    gobblock Boxing Addict banned

    5,623
    1
    Mar 20, 2009
    This poll should be public. Only Poles/Polish Americans answered Adamek, but now it can't be proven.
     
  14. lonsdale

    lonsdale Member Full Member

    391
    9
    Oct 11, 2011
    i thought the nbc crew was scoring it close to build up the suspense. I had cunningham winning clearly
     
  15. macp1

    macp1 Guest

    Crying whining Americans voted for USS